Careful with how much time you are spending in the office.. They are watching and firing people who arent in the office "enough time". Keep in mind there is NO policy which outlines time in office but they will still fire you!
12 replies (most recent on top)
with youtube and espn showing classics....yes it is year round
@25a is that game year around ?
My boss let's me leave to catch the cricket game on the tube at home hehehe
In my team one junior stays only 4 hours and leaves.. manager won’t say a thing as he is allowing another guy works from home every now and then from who he gets all his tech inputs. As the manager is illiterate and by fluke got this job and title, he is somehow maintaining this team and allowing these types of absenteeism. It’s all give and take policy. Very unprofessional.. did I say the manager is an Indian and has no tech skills .. got the job when his senior left the team and both were from same consulting.. when will this end ?
@1hw not in an at will employment state
@153 1. The source needs to receive a warning first. 2. If the expectation is 4 hours a day in the office this need to be present in the employee documentation. Otherwise, lawsuites are possible.
Yes our team had casualty of so called coffee swiping, the resource had been in office less than hour and it directly went to HR and was swift enough to let the employee go. As of now they're targeting employees with less than 4hours of in-office in the first draft but this could extend after several report runs.
Official rule is 8 hours.
I was shown this policy earlier this year.
Yes, like a lot of things at jpmc, the enforcement is at a managerial level so HR does not get involved at the individual level, unless there is an official RIF, in which case, there is a pecking order and attendance comes into play.
Decentralized management works, as long as you have good managers in place. If you're unfortunate to have bad management there is no where to go for resolution or escalation, unless there is a violation of policy or the law.
@cf They can move ahead and fire you, but haven't they is the question. I would suppose if an org was needed to be reduced you guys would be the first to go.
It depends on the manager. Some don’t care at all, while others are extremely strict. The manager sees the data, but how they respond also depends on the org or LOB. One person on my team, who travels an hour to get to work, was upset because he doesn’t have the same flexibility to arrive late or leave early like others do.
I see the same sentiment as mentioned in another post about how some people get light oversight. I would keep an eye on this type of rhetoric since we recently became RTO on Aug 25th. HR has the power to proceed, but question is why haven't they.
This is simply not true, unless you work in one of those sweatshop depts. Literally no one gives a f unless you are below 50%.
@ak I have to work 8-5. Be thankful you are not like me.