Useless Brock used to say working on single accounts environments was no longer future and you would be marked down for it. Now his saying leverage is no longer future. The guy just waffles on and doesnt give an answer to any question nor does he believe in what he says or does. How can you have someone like that who has no idea involved in a major reorg or leading a SSD.
8 replies (most recent on top)
DXC doesn’t know what it is. It doesn’t know what it sells, or how to price it. For years we’ve left clients stuck in the last century, waiting for the day they might specify and pay for an upgrade.
Sometimes we get caught out on a fixed-price deal. Sometimes the client feels stung and never trusts us again. More often, they just bring in someone else — because they see DXC as nothing but legacy.
Modern IT isn’t run on spreadsheets and emails. Yet many of our clients still operate this way, simply because nobody at DXC has shown them the alternative.
Talking about AI won’t make AI happen. It has to be built in from the ground up, with new systems and processes.
And while all this drags on, capable people have been left feeling bitter and undervalued — and now DXC wonders why nobody cares what happens to the company or its clients.
If your allocated to a single account it’s easier for layoffs if the account is lost….
Whats up with these jargons brock, c-suites can someone elaborate please.
Last year he lied about raises allocating all raises to his mates and giving other people 0%. People who had worked hard all year going the extra mile getting nothing because he is bent.
He also spouted that he had won a load of deals for cloud and everyone will need retrain to cloud.
Year on there is no sign off these so called wins. Just lying out of his rse as usual. He keeps moving the goal posts every month and you cant believe any of his lies.
The most devious guy in DXC would be his main quality.
What I dont understand is the whole "keep your career mobile" bullsh-t he's always spouting. Does he not realise that some of us are in operational positions, and that if a stack of us rotated "upwards" (as he puts it), it would greatly reduce the company's ability to keep the lights on? Like is he THAT far removed from the front line?
Im a manager who works for Broken, except for a couple of brown noses most of us subordinates despise him and his narrow mind thinking.
He will have less power after this restructure, but until then we also have to endure him and his sheet.
What's wrong? No real strategy. No useful communication. Managers kept in the dark by executives (who don't have a real strategy). Bad internal systems so they really don't have a clue on the business, which in turn leads to bad business decisions. Legacy company cultures at the employee levels have kept it afloat, because at the end of the day most people want to do good for their customers. But that culture has eroded severely, and the continued revenue decline and lack of growth shows it. Someone needs to hit the reset button and get back to basics - Customers, Employees then Business results come with success. Rinse and repeat. It's really so simple that the executives can't see it.
His the biggest gopher, and non transparent person in DXC, none of his replies make sense, and most of his statement start by "i cant share it". There is no need for a leader like that always creating uncertainty and untruths.