Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Chevron seems to work hard against developing anyone’s potential

I never had grand ambitions, just wanted to apply my engineering skills. I've been through several major companies, but none, and I mean none, made any real effort to develop or even recognize what people bring to the table. Not even for the company’s own benefit.

The structure doesn’t allow for growth. It barely taps into a tenth of what any of us are capable of. The system actively works against it, made worse by managers who often don’t even understand what we have to offer, let alone support it.

So seeing valuable people let go in this reorg doesn’t surprise me one bit.

by
| 2761 views | | 9 replies (last August 10) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k1ryxgad

9 replies (most recent on top)

I agree with the poster about this statement but I don’t believe Chevron is good at developing the management talent. They select “yes” people not leaders for management and continue to get the same declining results year after year.

“Although management still recognizes the need to recognize and build new management talent, the focus on building broader workforce compliance and a development chain of SMEs has been lost.“

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18c+1k1ryxgad

"Permian ... our biggest technical playground". Yes, but considering this resource will be in steep decline within the next 5 years, one wonders what will become of our untrained petro tech workforce. One invests today in workforce competency for tomorrow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18b+1k1ryxgad

The handwriting was on the wall when the Permian became our biggest technical playground. You don't need 'career development' to pattern drill in West Texas.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x1+1k1ryxgad

OP, you're entirely correct. That's why you have to work on your own to develop your career and talents, then leverage them to another company. This has been a winning formula in the oil industry for decades: get good at what you do, jump companies for higher title and pay, then repeat. And repeat. It's your choice: there are plenty of people out there who spent most of their career with a company like Chevron, and retired as relative unknowns (that is, no career accomplishments) but financially sound. Then there's people who worked for a number of companies over the years, retired financially well and with name recognition in their line of work. Those are the people who "retire" to be consultants or academicians.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tz+1k1ryxgad

Factory doesn't need employees to develop - Just keep doing what you doing and nothing else. They do however develop select few wh are selected early before they are tested. It's been that way since the start of the FL program, Only difference now is that non FLs options consist of the same shop floor. Churn Churn Churn

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1k1ryxgad

A decade ago, there was some effort to develop SMEs across disciplines and recognize advancement of technical experts with more external conference attendance and internal mentoring responsibilities. Although management still recognizes the need to recognize and build new management talent, the focus on building broader workforce compliance and a development chain of SMEs has been lost. Sadly, that is probably one reason we can’t seem to find oil anymore and need to focus on M&A for reserves replacement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @db+1k1ryxgad

Identify as a fee-mail and your career will be handed to you. Pretty simple formula Chevron follows now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1k1ryxgad

it suprised me as I was hoping it will be much different. I agree - seems there is no true focus effort to keep "the best of the best". In IT, they marked entire teams as "out of scope" since they are part of a major project - even though many of them are not even the people we really need to win and just got lucky to be in the project.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k1ryxgad

They only develop you if you’re labeled a hipo when hired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k1ryxgad

Post a reply

: