I have an issue with Fidelity's leadership model, for one it's a scripted process that leaders follow so most are not true leaders in which they are not able to display true leadership capabilities or not. The other aspect I take issue with is in the monthly, quarterly meetings that the onerous is placed on the employee to lead the meeting or in a QCI the employee is expected write up their own review under the guise of your chance to highlight your accomplishments to "remind" the leader. Give me a break, keeping up with your staff and what they are accomplishing, what they add to your team & what could be improved is the manager/ leader's job.
A bit off topic but goes into the QCI is when these roles are expecting employees to perform activities in my opinion beyond the true role such as leadership on the team or being on committees, to me it seems another way to get more work out of associates without adequate compensation. What I see, employees taking on these tasks not because they want to or have a passion for it but that they need to check a box.
In all reality is that Fidelity has to find something to bring out that the employee could improve upon when- what it should be is the employee doing their job- yes or no then if something needs attention to bring it up right then and there and skip this monthly meeting non-sense. Fidelity is becoming more micro managerial style which for most do not work well under.