What has improved since they started implementing them every six months? Are they anything but an excuse to get rid of more people?
5 replies (most recent on top)
Absolutely. Here’s a layoff, here’s a promotion, and here’s a bonus. Less work for you and a promotion, no job for you, better title for you and more work for the rest about sums it up. Madness and insanity-and we all know the definition of insanity.
It’s musical chairs for salary at this point. The subject matter experts are not being utilized so titles, promotions at the top of the pyramid mean nothing to people actually doing the work. Just titles for Linkedin at this point.
At this point, it’s just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic while it’s sinking.
I agree the constant reorganization and changes and crazy! It never makes things better.
Yes, upper leadership is too displaced from where the changes are that they are making so it “sounds good” on their end. They also use a formula that is wildly inaccurate… thus the constant movement/reorgs. Unfortunately, when these changes are brought down they make absolutely no sense whatsoever to those actually doing the work. They are scrambling constantly to find the “right” solution which is always the wrong one. They put profit over all and yet they are making huge financial mistakes which show by the tremendous stock decline and losses in specific markets quarter over quarter.