how the company consistently scrutinizes various roles across the org when deciding where to cut or invest during reorgs/layoffs, yet shows little to no critical evaluation of the roles that arguably have the greatest impact on our performance: the executive leadership team and the 1-2 layers directly beneath them.
But hey, keep cutting the peons and see how that reignites the Nike and Jordan brand energy.
Which executive team leaders were replaced?
Has everyone forgotten about the huge number of those leaders that were impacted last year? Short-term memory loss that supports your narrative, but not accurate.
The fox is in charge of the hen house
It’s like raaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiin on your wedding day
“You cannot solve a problem with the same mind that created it.”
it's because the people who are in charge of scrutinizing the roles are in the roles that need to be scrutinized most.