Thread regarding Morgan Stanley layoffs

2000 Cuts

Good luck all.

Morgan Stanley Workforce Reduction – March 2025

  • Layoffs Planned: Morgan Stanley will cut 2%–3% of its global workforce (~2,000 employees) by the end of March 2025
  • Exclusions: Financial advisers are not part of the layoffs
  • Reasons for Cuts:
    |-------- Reassessment of employee location and performance
    |-------- Cost management under new CEO Ted Pick
    |-------- Increased use of automation and AI
  • Not Market-Driven: Layoffs are not directly tied to inflation or economic anxieties
  • Strategic Additions: Despite cuts, the firm is hiring in some areas—particularly higher-level roles in investment banking
  • Industry Context:
    |-------- Follows reports that Goldman Sachs plans to cut 3%–5% of its staff
    |-------- Reflects a broader industry trend amid economic uncertainty
  • Executive Commentary:
    |-------- M&A and IPO activity are currently “on pause”
    |-------- Uncertainty around trade policy is impacting markets, but also driving demand for financial advice
  • Stock Performance: Morgan Stanley shares are up 33.6% over the past 12 months

Source:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/morgan-stanley-is-the-latest-bank-to-trim-its-workforce-heres-why-3ea68ae1

by
| 1871 views | | 4 replies (last April 6, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jqwnnf60

4 replies (most recent on top)

This places su-ks and treats people so bad. They cut people in the worst time. It will be almost impossible to land another job anytime soon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @t8+1jqwnnf60

Rising costs for a company that essentially generates revenue by moving numbers around… The only thing the exces seem to be focused on is inflating the stock price to please the board & the fastest way to do that is axing employees (and the know that Wall Street reacts blindly to headcount cuts)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jqwnnf60

We've become so accustomed to hearing about layoffs that it's troubling how normalized they've become - 100%, people are not even paying attention any more... Even 100 job losses shouldn't be seen as routine, it's a huge trauma and we just ignore it - each of those jobs likely supports a family, so you're really looking at around 300 lives being impacted by this (what we consider) small cut.

Now, talking about 2000, we'll that's a number, it's a small city size kind of population that's affected.

But rest assured, those on the top will be making even more money.

So how much do you really need, $1B or two, or twenty? Does that even change anything in your life?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jqwnnf60

What if the burger joint had a bunch of executives who never flip a single burger but take home most of the profits?

That’s where I’d start cutting back, I’d trim the fat at the top. It'd be a bigger bank for a buck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jqwnnf60

Post a reply

: