Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Feedback HSE Was Give Last Year By External Consultants

The following is the feedback the senior leaders in HSE received either last year or the year before and nothing was done with it. It is based on the perspective of the HSE employees:

  1. Incompetent Leadership and Lack of Accountability

Concern: The HSE team is led by someone with little to no background in safety or environmental management. The leader is often unavailable, uninterested, or uninformed about key safety protocols. There is a constant failure to hold team members accountable for safety-related issues, with frequent cover-ups when incidents happen.

Impact: This lack of leadership can lead to poorly communicated safety guidelines, ineffective incident investigations, and an overall culture of negligence. Employees may feel that safety is not a priority.

  1. Favoritism in Promotions

Concern: Promotions within the HSE team are based on personal relationships rather than merit or qualifications. Employees who excel in their roles and have the necessary expertise are passed over for promotion in favor of those with closer ties to leadership, even if those individuals lack safety experience or skills.

Impact: This can lead to a lack of trust within the team, decreased morale, and the promotion of less qualified individuals, ultimately harming the effectiveness of the team. It can also encourage high-performing personnel to leave the organization due to a perceived lack of opportunity.

  1. Understaffing and Overwork

Concern: The HSE team is consistently understaffed due to budget constraints or poor planning. As a result, remaining team members are overworked and stretched thin, juggling multiple responsibilities with little support. The team is unable to address all safety issues in a timely manner.

Impact: Important safety checks and audits are missed, incidents are not investigated thoroughly, and proactive safety measures are ignored because of a lack of manpower. Overworked employees are more likely to burn out, leading to further inefficiencies.

  1. Lack of Training and Development

Concern: The HSE team does not receive adequate or up-to-date training, which leaves them unprepared to handle emerging safety challenges or industry standards. Employees are promoted without proper leadership or technical training, and there's no investment in the continuous professional development of the team.

Impact: This can lead to poor decision-making, mishandling of safety issues, and an inability to implement new safety measures effectively. It could also result in non-compliance with industry regulations and an increase in workplace accidents.

  1. Communication Breakdown and Poor Employee Engagement

Concern: The HSE team operates in isolation, with little to no communication with other departments. Leadership rarely communicates safety goals, updates, or issues to employees. Workers feel disconnected from the team, and there is little feedback or collaboration on safety concerns.

Impact: Safety measures are not well understood or followed by employees because they haven’t been properly communicated. Employees are less likely to report hazards or incidents because they don’t feel comfortable or that their concerns will be addressed. This fosters a toxic environment where safety is not taken seriously across the organization.

by
| 2151 views | | 11 replies (last April 2, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jqv63v0g

11 replies (most recent on top)

No consultant on this earth has ever come into an organization and said they need more people

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bh+1jqv63v0g

HSE Blah Blab Blah and more HSE blah blah blah....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jqv63v0g

Point 3. Understaffing and overwork.

Lol. Really? Let me introduce you to the HSE org in any other O&G company...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1jqv63v0g

Blah Blah Blah HSE Blah Blahb Blab blah HSE BLah BLah Blah Blab

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1jqv63v0g

I understand the perspective being shared, but I believe it’s important to note that senior leadership may not prioritize this issue. I’ve raised similar concerns with my manager in the past, and her position has been clear—she does not make decisions based on content shared on this platform.

If you have strong opinions on the matter, I encourage direct communication, as it’s more effective to address such things face-to-face. Now, she may fire you for pointing out problems right after she labels you a troublemaker so proceed with caution.

Regarding the individual mentioned by @a5+1jqv63v0g, I am aware that they were engaged in consulting at the time. From my position in SCM, I can confirm that over the past five years, HSE has worked with or had contracts with several prominent consulting firms, including:

McKinsey & Company

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Bain & Company

Deloitte

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)

EY (Ernst & Young)

KPMG

These firms frequently provide similar feedback in their engagements. I hope this clarifies the situation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1jqv63v0g

HSE is always on here because they are self righteous and believe they are the guardians of the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jqv63v0g

Why is every other post about HSE? They matter so little in the current context.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jqv63v0g

There’s no attack here. Just a simple call out that the OP is talking BS. Who was the consultant?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jqv63v0g

@a5+1 speaking of tendencies, organizations that receive critical feedback tend to be defensive, in denial, and attack the messenger.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jqv63v0g

Ye. Consultants tend to provide negative feedback to organizations, not. HSEs chosen consultant was Luis and he was a lizard of a human.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jqv63v0g

I see you HSE and raise you SCM!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jqv63v0g

Post a reply

: