Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Reflecting on My Time at Chevron

After five years with Chevron, I have made the difficult decision to move on from the company. When I first joined in 2019, fresh out of college, I was eager to learn and grow professionally. However, my experience here has taught me that advancement often depends more on personal connections and adherence to specific diversity initiatives than on merit or performance.

In my role within the Safety department, I quickly realized that while people are polite on the surface, there is often a hidden layer of political maneuvering. When I first joined, I was introduced to a Talent Manager and a Sponsor, both of whom were supposed to guide me toward opportunities aligned with my career aspirations. However, in my interactions with them, I frequently heard the same excuse: it was a "year for high-potential candidates" or "a year to prioritize DEI candidates." When I asked for clarification or the opportunity to engage more directly with the process, I was told that such discussions were confidential and closed off to outsiders. Ironically, the outcomes of these discussions would often be shared among leaders and their close associates within hours. Gossip, rumors and lies are currency in this function. If you can throw someone under the bus in an excruciating manner, you are the Queen.

I initially believed I had found a promising career at Chevron, drawn by the competitive salary and the proximity to my home in Houston. However, my experience has shown me that the company’s culture and internal dynamics do not support the growth and development of its employees in a meaningful way. Instead, talent and hard work often take a backseat to favoritism and internal politics.

Additionally, the ethical challenges I encountered were both disheartening and surprising. I was often asked to downplay incidents or present misleading information in order to avoid negative scrutiny. On one occasion, I was told that while safety was a priority, if I could find a way to classify an incident as "non-recordable," it would be appreciated. The pressure to conceal the truth and prioritize appearances over integrity was unsettling.

I came to realize that many of my colleagues, though perhaps well-intentioned at one point in their careers, had become disillusioned and compromised by the system. There were moments where I was advised to compartmentalize my personal values and beliefs from my professional role. I was told, for instance, that while it’s acceptable to live a Christian lifestyle of fairness and honesty at home, these values should be put aside at work.

At this stage, I am looking forward to the next chapter in my life, and I plan to take time to reflect, recharge, and rediscover my personal sense of purpose. I am grateful for the lessons learned during my time at Chevron, but I now realize that the work environment here is not one where I can thrive or contribute in a meaningful way. While I once believed the grass might be greener elsewhere, I now understand that stepping away is the right decision for my well-being and professional growth.

by
| 5261 views | | 31 replies (last March 20, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jpn7wffc

31 replies (most recent on top)

For sure you survive this, it will happen again in a few years.. 5 years should have exposed you to 1 or 2 reorgs. Anyone jointing this company should be aware of regular layoffs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1jpn7wffc

Sorry, five years when compared to a career is not a reflection! It is just a ripple as your pi’s-sing in a puddle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f0+1jpn7wffc

It used to be that it took until about year 10 or 15 into one's career to realize that you were either rising in Chevron (unlikely), or your career was flat-lining (most likely). Now OP and his/her peers realize this after just 5 years. Further decay of Chevron's "culture".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1jpn7wffc

Thank you ChatGPT, for this comment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ed+1jpn7wffc

OP's diatribe should be quietly handed out to every college grad considering employment at Chevron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1jpn7wffc

OP everything you say is exactly right and very insightful and well written.

I cannot find one insight I don’t agree with. I’m not in the H…. S….. E….. arena but I’m in a corp function and I can say it’s even way worse than yours.

It’s all so sad but lackluster and non accountable mgmt has gotten us here. And they all for most part just got their jobs back and your front mgmt got their job back and I never see anything changing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1jpn7wffc

The Company is highly political... The people left after the reorg will be highly connected. As for the DEI excuse- that's simply what it is- an excuse. I fall into that DEI category & was given plenty of excuses why I shouldn't be up for a promotion for a million different reasons. In the HR meetings, you'll see many employees complaining about the lack of transparency in the promotion process. They won't have to worry about that much longer because most of the jobs will move offshore & the employees have a high turnover. That in itself is a form of promotion controlled by the employees. Sounds like you were very unhappy so glad you were able to find something that will make you happier. After moving to many different companies & industries, I find there are always people I hate working with, processes that are ridiculous, but yes, the extent does differ by company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1jpn7wffc

Get that money and go, good call

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1jpn7wffc

I also prefer White Christian Nationalists keep that sh-t at home.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1jpn7wffc

How do you know if you’re a “high flyer “

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jpn7wffc

“High fliers” are the strangest thing I’ve encountered so far at Chevron. Seems to be a religious-like anointment rather than merit based decision. As for the DEI thing…I’ve been told straight to my face by my manager that I was passed over because I wasn’t a DEI candidate. Then you got to spend the next few years pretending that they are doing the best work ever because you don’t want to offend anyone and lose chances to promote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1jpn7wffc

I beg to differ, Chevron is full of opportunities, only place I know that through no internal interview, nor experience you can slap on a new title and right there you are the SME. No training, other than picking up the buzz words and before you know it is time for promotion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1jpn7wffc

If you would read all of the post, you would see the guy/girl said. "I’m being forced to say “Safety department” because if I phrase it any other way, the post gets taken down. But for clarity, the function I worked in can be identified by the initials of the first letter of each word: HelenSmithEdwards."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1jpn7wffc

"Safety Department" .... yeah, this guy never worked for CVX a day in his life, and is a troll

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1jpn7wffc

If by "safety department" you mean PSM, yeah it su-ks knowing management will shoot down any process safety recommendations that aren't required by state law or an MFG standard. If it costs money, it'll be slow-walked to the last opportunity to address it too. I understand low morale in that department.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jpn7wffc

And wonder where the people came from that run those organizations. One clue. The same function we are talking about here. They are truly a joke in the industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1jpn7wffc

ETC - CTC is the worst

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1jpn7wffc

When I hired into Chevron , I thought I had died and gone to heaven. I worked with top notch people and learned a lot. I was proud to wear the Chevron logo.
Did many years of expat service that were the best years of my life, despite really sc--wed up project executions and politics. The safety folks in the field were about 80% highly committed. Life back in Houston was way too much talk, politics and meetings and very inefficient. I moved on I am glad I did. Wishing you the same luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jpn7wffc

To the last poster. That was a bit wordy. All you have to do is look at the GMs and the VP of that function. Enough said. Tragic DEI mess.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jpn7wffc

One last thing I need to point out—I've noticed that the personnel in this department are significantly less knowledgeable compared to their counterparts at other oil and gas companies. It seems that most of the team here are simply project managers who take credit for the work done by contractors, without contributing anything of value themselves. What I find particularly frustrating is that many of those overseeing field operations have never stepped foot in the field themselves. It's honestly baffling when they try to speak about their “experience” and present it as impressive. It’s hard to take them seriously when they’ve never even picked up a wrench.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jpn7wffc

This is the 3rd company I have worked for and I am in the same department as the OP but in MCBU. I was a field contractor for another company working for Chevron for 4 years and I worked for Anadarko for 3 years. Both jobs were a lot harder than my work at Chevron. Chevron is definitely white glove when it comes to employees but my time as a contractor and time at Anadarko were more rewarding with lifelong friends and truly people I trust. Chevron people are incredibly nice to your face but will trash talk you as soon as you turn around. No one takes ownership. You have to blame someone else for all the issues and problems and yes nepotism and name dropping is out of control over here. To be honest, if I was not so well compensated, I would be out of here in a second but I can take most of the backstabbing from the ladies I work for.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jpn7wffc

I hired on about that time also. I have had nothing but good experiences and hope to remain at Chevron if possible. None of the experiences that you had sound familiar to me. However, I am aware that Chevron employees are rather sheltered. Good luck out in the real world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jpn7wffc

Also a new grad that started around the same time frame as you. Also really ready to head out/be laid off in July. I'm tired of this company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jpn7wffc

Anyone who uses the phrase "toxic environment" has literally never had a real job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1jpn7wffc

Chat GPT is not your friend. It's obvious that you just got out of indoctrination in 2019.
I'd say time to put on big boy pants but not sure her/him/she/it/they/used to be/was

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1jpn7wffc

Be careful mate, SG (reverse the initials) is watching and she will come after you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jpn7wffc

Thanks for questioning as I think it is important to find out if someone is telling the truth or not so, I’m the OP, and let’s get straight to it. I’m being forced to say “Safety department” because if I phrase it any other way, the post gets taken down. But for clarity, the function I worked in can be identified by the initials of the first letter of each word: HelenSmithEdwards.

When I joined, DP was the VP, followed by MB. My talent manager at the time was JJ. He was old, spent most of his career in Thailand, and made no secret of his disdain for DEI initiatives. His exact words? “I hate this DEI sh**.” He retired and moved to Florida around 2020/2021. He also constantly claimed that BM—who was apparently around a long time ago—would be rolling over in his grave if he saw what DP did.

JJ was developing a "red light model," which was supposed to determine if someone was actually ready for promotion based on three specific criteria. Many of us met all the criteria and had green scorecards. Yet, people with red lights—who clearly weren’t qualified—were being promoted or placed into the most desirable roles. Why? Because they were someone’s daughter or had the right connections. The red light model had to be scrapped because it blatantly exposed the rampant nepotism.

If you need more facts, let me know. I am happy to provide anything you need except my name as I have not left yet and I don't wanna burn a bridge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jpn7wffc

“Safety department”? Never heard of it. You sure? Also, as a former talent manager from that time frame, I guarantee that those words weren’t spoken to you. Guarantee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jpn7wffc

I’m now in my seventh year in the same department and waiting for my package to move on. The environment has become toxic. Wishing you all the best—perhaps our paths will cross again in our next chapter. Best of luck, fellow five to seven year veteran.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jpn7wffc

I think you will find other large corporations the same or worse. You may be better off in local government or non profit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jpn7wffc

To be frank, the decision may have already been made on your behalf. I understand that your department has a reputation as one of the most challenging places to work at Chevron, though other groups may offer only a slight improvement. I wish you the best in your next endeavor and sincerely hope you wait to receive your package rather than making a hasty departure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jpn7wffc

Post a reply

: