Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Potential and S&D

Last few questions got a good conversation going, though of adding this here. Maybe filks can add from their experience as well to help younger ones figure out their out of this career mess. Everybody deserves being treated with dignity and respect and is owed professional development.

Sponsored hi-pos are Senior Executive potential i.e 38+ — for these people picked by sponsors or nepotism tylically, all assignments are pre decided and they are given highest preference to ‘key roles’ to gather ‘key experiences’. Supervisor has no say, DM has no say. There is a COED..exec development committee above all, who are hidden in shadows and you never see them, who take care of these special people. Is it fair? Not for the most part, but a few bright individuals do make this list. You know wothin 3 years of joining the company and you must be a campus hire or atleast Exxon bred. These mostly American, Australian or English men.

Next group is 34+ or Executives such as VPs for EMTEC, Managers of businesses, regions , LCMs of important countries like Guyana. Senior S&D has some say, but discipline managers supervisors are still non consequential to these roles. These are mostly American, Australian or Canadian women.

An exec typically picks his own and then pulls them up, hence you’ll say YES men and women all the time who absolutely hate people who report to them and wag their tails like a dog for those they report to.

These two group form the core reason of Exxon’s toxic work culture.

Next group is 31-34, the Chiefs, Development Managers, Senior commercial advisors, Dev Planning managers etc. These are surpirsingly smart people, for the most part, who were too smart for their own good, hence couldn’t make it further. They are also the fodder for eventual lower ranking in higher rank groups, but ehy have made peace with it and defibitely enough money to not care anymore. S&D has control on this category.

Now you come to 29 and below. 28-29 are still second line managers, or principals or maybe some senior principals, asset managers, S&D managers. This is the highest a normal employee can imagine getting to. Lot of dirty politics and selling yourself regularly can get you here but no further. Pay is decent, but jobs are super stressful.

Everything below these CLs is random assignments and lies to your face in IDP. There is no plan for you, no strategy, you are not even close to being as special as you think you are in your head.

by
| 2193 views | | 6 replies (last March 15, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jp9cpm56

6 replies (most recent on top)

Share this with the people around you, this is the unfiltered truth and reality.

I’d add inly sociopaths and those willing to give up family and/or health make it to 34+. Hence they are so unpleasant to work with, they think they are on some ‘mission’. There are literally brainwashing sessions , also know as Planning assignments, and those who come out of these make it further.

Ask your Supervisor and S&D — how are people selected for Planning roles? Why is this not transparent as apparently one has to go through Planning for higher potential roles?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1jp9cpm56

How about these folks on the announcement site? How are they moving around? The funny thing is I might only know one name out of dozens.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1jp9cpm56

Great post. Will only add that the worker bees - the ones who do the most lifting - are at a CL below 28. They’re the backbone to the organization.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d3+1jp9cpm56

Need to emphasize here that the CL levels in the original post are potentials, not real assigned CLs. The real CL ladder now stops at CL29 for all but a few. Many of the roles that we think of as exec roles are actually filled by 29s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1jp9cpm56

Bottom line, "It is a job, not a long-term career at ExxonMobil for most of the employees."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1jp9cpm56

This post is the best and most honest I’ve read on here so far!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jp9cpm56

Post a reply

: