Thread regarding USAA layoffs

The State of FSB as of 12/31/2024

BLUF:
The bank maintains strong capital and liquidity positions, providing a solid foundation to address profitability challenges. However, the significant shift from profit to loss in Q4 requires immediate management attention to expense control and credit quality management.

My thoughts:
Head of Bank credit card has to go. It's the lagger of all.

Source:
https://cdr.ffiec.gov/public/ManageFacsimiles.aspx#
Q3 2024 - Q4 2024

Summary:
Concerning Trends:

  1. Net loss of $110 million in Q4 2024, deteriorating from a profit of $65 million in Q3
  2. Capital ratios remain strong but declined quarter-over-quarter
  3. Rising interest expense (+30.7% from Q3 to Q4) outpacing interest income growth
  4. Significant increase in non-interest expenses (+40.0% from Q3 to Q4)
  5. Credit card portfolio showing signs of stress with increasing charge-offs

Positive Developments:

  1. Strong capital position with Total Capital Ratio at 17.57% (well above regulatory minimums)
  2. Healthy liquidity with increased cash and balances
  3. Stable deposit base with minimal reliance on brokered deposits
  4. Solid asset quality with manageable non-performing loans
  5. Prudent risk management reflected in increased loan loss provisions

Financial Performance:
Income Statement Analysis-

  1. Revenue Growth: Interest income increased from $4.17B to $5.58B (+33.8%), but was outpaced by interest expense growth
  2. Net Interest Income: Grew from $3.30B to $4.45B (+34.7%), showing margin improvement
  3. Loan Loss Provisions: Increased from $738M to $1.04B (+40.5%), suggesting prudent risk management amid economic uncertainty
  4. Non-Interest Expense: Significant increase from $3.90B to $5.46B (+40.0%), driving net loss

Balance Sheet Trends-

  1. Total Assets: Declined slightly from $110.32B to $109.22B (-1.0%)
  2. Loan Portfolio: Relatively stable at $45.14B in Q4 vs $44.64B in Q3 (+1.1%)
  3. Deposits: Steady at $95.96B in Q4 vs $95.41B in Q3 (+0.6%)
  4. Securities Portfolio: Slight decline in total securities from $53.64B to $53.17B (-0.9%)

Capital and Liquidity-

  1. Tier 1 Capital Ratio: Decreased from 16.47% to 16.30%, but remains well above regulatory minimums

Total Capital Ratio: Declined from 17.74% to 17.57%, still indicating strong capital adequacy
Leverage Ratio: Decreased from 8.63% to 8.48%, remaining healthy
Cash and Balances: Increased from $10.20B to $11.05B (+8.3%), enhancing liquidity position

Risk Assessment:

Credit Quality-

  1. Credit cards showing increasing delinquencies with 30-89 day past due loans at $146M in Q4
  2. Total non-performing loans moderate at $510M (1.13% of total loans)
  3. Loan loss reserves adequate at $1.73B (3.83% of total loans), suggesting conservative loss coverage

Interest Rate Risk-

  1. Rising interest costs impacting profitability, with interest expense growing 30.7%
  2. Securities portfolio showing unrealized losses of $5.13B due to higher rate environment
  3. Duration mismatch evident with longer-term assets funded by shorter-term liabilities. With gap ratio at ~0.34, USAA FSB is struggling to meet the short-term liabilities. Maybe this is why OCC and many others were all over the FSB in Q4 2024??? If FSB doesn't address this, we are looking at quarterly loss of ~150 million dollars along with decline in Tier 1 capital ratio. if Q1 2025 numbers don't improve, I would jump ship.

Operational Efficiency-

  1. Significant increase in operating expenses raising concerns about cost control
  2. Credit card rewards expenses appear high at $639M in Q4
  3. Staffing relatively stable with 14,353 FTEs in Q4 vs 14,205 in Q3
by
| 2811 views | | 10 replies (last March 10, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jmwx2t9p

10 replies (most recent on top)

The true cost of Bank is being hidden by the enterprise expense allocation. The existence of Bank imposes significant additional overhead on the other CoSAs in terms of both cost and operational (in)efficiency which is not properly attributed to Bank. If it was, Bank would have been spun off or shut down years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @27f+1jmwx2t9p

Starting to get rid of all the dead weight low performers is a start. Manage them out and save the money you’d have to spend on severances.

You don’t have to like that and I’m sure the more tenured old-school Eagles won’t like it, but know this is what big banks do and gone are the “we’re a big USAA family” days.

Work harder if you want to stay relevant in this company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jm+1jmwx2t9p

The bank president is a finance guy 1st and foremost. He keeps saying “the bank will be profitable this year” well with no new products to offer, only way to save is to cut aka layoffs, which he is going to do each quarter. The bank will be a skeleton by the time we get to Q4 and if the bank still isn’t profitable even with massive layoffs, look for the bank to be on the sale block in 2026.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ft+1jmwx2t9p

Well, it could be worse I guess. Now would be a good time to jump ship and move to another area or employer if you are in the bank.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fe+1jmwx2t9p

Well..the bank pres announced his buddy has been promoted to SVP as CFO of FSB. So relax guys, everything’s fine!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1jmwx2t9p

@ar+1jmwx2t9p

You understand what “unrealized losses” are, right? JPM had unrealized losses of $40B in 2023. Every investor that has ever existed has had, at some point, unrealized losses on their portfolio.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1jmwx2t9p

Please don’t walk past that “unrealized losses of $5.13B”

That should be the only line. Period.

Making a few million? Losing a few million.

  • BILLIONS LOST -
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jmwx2t9p

Why would the peanut-sized FSB need so many FTEs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jmwx2t9p

Ty for the deep dive, greatly appreciated

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jmwx2t9p

Hmmm

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jmwx2t9p

Post a reply

: