Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

26-31% cuts in the US

If Chevron aims to save $3 billion through workforce reductions, and they announced a 20% cut globally, we can estimate how much of that savings will come from U.S. employees versus international employees.

Step 1: Understanding Workforce Distribution

Chevron has 45,600 employees globally, excluding service station workers.

A significant portion of their workforce is based in the United States, where salaries and benefits are generally higher than in international locations.

Let's assume that about 50-60% of Chevron’s payroll costs are in the U.S., given the higher salaries and benefits there.

Step 2: Estimating Payroll Cost per Region

If we estimated Chevron’s total payroll cost at around $12.35 billion, and assume 55% of it is U.S.-based, then:

U.S. Payroll = $6.79 billion

Global Payroll = $5.56 billion

Step 3: Allocating the $3 Billion Savings

The 20% workforce reduction is not necessarily a 20% payroll cut, since higher-paid positions are more likely to be cut in the U.S.

Since U.S. salaries are higher, Chevron may aim for a higher % reduction in the U.S. than the global average.

Potential Payroll Cuts

If we assume 60-70% of the $3 billion savings must come from the U.S. due to higher salaries, that means $1.8B to $2.1B will be from U.S. payroll.

If U.S. payroll is $6.79B, then Chevron would need to cut 26-31% of U.S. payroll costs to reach their savings target.

This suggests that U.S. job cuts will likely be higher than 20%, potentially in the range of 26-31% of U.S. employees.

Conclusion

Chevron's global workforce reduction is set at 20%, but U.S. job cuts will likely be 25-30% to account for the higher payroll costs. This would contribute $1.8B-$2.1B toward the $3 billion cost-saving target.

Thank you ChatGPT

by
| 4371 views | | 12 replies (last February 19, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jmbcqvch

12 replies (most recent on top)

Plus we should assume that the vast majority of the cuts will be focused on US salaried workers, not hourly workers. That means that a high volume of engineers and IT people will be cut. So the percentage of salaried workers in the US could be 40% reductions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e8+1jmbcqvch

Have a friend who is pretty high up and hate to break it to you but they are planning on cutting almost exclusively Americans because that is where the money is. Replacing them with Indian engineers is a patently stupid idea but that is where we are at.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1jmbcqvch

You needed chatHPT to come up with a conclusion that anyone with a working neuron can deduct in a millisecond?

The decline of human intelligence continues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1jmbcqvch

45% CTC locked already

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cg+1jmbcqvch

This is pretty simple math, the reliance on ChatGPT to construct your thesis here is telling…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1jmbcqvch

ABU is the cash cow

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bn+1jmbcqvch

Have you seen the salaries in ABU. There is a lot to cut there and cvx will save some money!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jmbcqvch

What's the difference? 5% cut or 50% cut makes no difference. You will either get sacked or you won't. Trolls on here want you to think the chances are high of getting cut, but the chances don't really matter. Everyone should be prepared at all times, but especially now, to look for work elsewhere. In IT people change employers all the time. It's really not a big deal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jmbcqvch

Chevron intends $2 billion to $3 billion of structural cost reductions by 2026. Structural cost reduction aren't limited to personnel costs. It would include numerous capital costs, including assets, CAPEX, and OpEx spending. No need to psych yourself out by assuming that employees are going to experience something worse than what has been explicitly communicated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jmbcqvch

This also doesn't address the offset of the Engine new hires. If they lay off 10 in the US and hire 8 in India, that's still a 20% reduction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jmbcqvch

It’s not $3B from workforce reductions alone. The $3B includes asset sales, moving work to India and other reductions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jmbcqvch

The logic is flawed. They announce 15-20% headcount reduction. We can assume India is safe. Thus, headcount reduction in the US, GOP, Australia will be disproportionally higher than 20%.

Yours,
Daddy Mike

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jmbcqvch

Post a reply

: