Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

BAE... what is going v what is staying?

https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1vUbQlt0

As I understand it DXC is losing most of the new BAE contract is going to other suppliers along with their entire SIAM model. What is actually staying? Networks supposedly is staying or is that rubbish?

I also hear hosting is staying because 1) DXC has the lions share of legacy BAE infrastructure hostage in its kent datacentres and 2) nobody else was eager to take on the responsibility of unpicking the clusterfock of bad infra when so many projects failed go live ORR

I was about when they warned all the TAs that VMAS3 was out of capacity but we werent allowed to tell the client because the go live for the next iteration 4 I think was still months away and I firmly remember what a mess Airlnk was because nobody in run would touch it with a 10ft bargepole

So what's going on?

by
| 1901 views | | 6 replies (last January 19, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jghqj1g3

6 replies (most recent on top)

SIEM and Arcsight in particular are actually quite hard things to get right and make it deliver an effective service. It needs a lot more than basic skills and requires a deep knowledge of the environment you are monitoring.

Which of course means DXC spectacularly fails.

Arcsight is also super expensive, so what we offer is poor value at a high price.

Customers do pay it though as even with a useless service it ticks a box for external audit. Worth those dollars just for that...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2s9+1jghqj1g3

SIAM = ArcSight or 'ArcShite' for those in the know. DXC SOC capabilities around this sytem are woeful and extend back to the disgrace that was CSC. Govt agencies have been trying to move away for years but have no experience in this area and have a poor track record with tools such as Splunk.
The main reason DXC is shrinking quarter on quarter is due to internal politics and pi-s poor management. Anybody worth their salt has already left or are hanging on in the hope of being made redundant. Younger IT people are subject to the most appalling employment practises. Any organisation looking to outsource should perform due dligence and not just be su-ked in by lowest cost solutions offerd by Snake Oil dealers such as DXC. Security is not cheap, it has never been cheap and it never will be cheap.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2s5+1jghqj1g3

Redundancy package incoming..... hopefully
Lets see how many uptick this

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h6+1jghqj1g3

Both DXC staff and BAE need to rid themselves of DXC policy, processes and practices, shift the people and kit to CG or whoever, and get some processes that actually work. You can't get a thing done round here. Mosely because nobody cares, because it's seemingly irrelevant what we do or don't do. The only reward for doing well is more work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ec+1jghqj1g3

Service Desk (and extended SIAM, whatever that means, BAE aren't saying) is going to CG. DXC are keeping hosting and the rest was up for bidding.

It seems that CG have also won the EUC contract. To be honest all the internal Perseus updates have been shocking and BAE either haven't got a clue or don't want to tell their own staff as it sounds like some of them will be going to CG too.

Networks is out for tender. Last we heard Orange, BT, AT&T, Vodafone and Fujitsu were bidding but I know some have since dropped for various reasons.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1jghqj1g3

same story as at all other major DXC clients around the globe - all the future facing areas (all AI related, SIAM, cloud etc) are being taken off DXC and given to other vendors or in-sourced, and legacy too-hard-and-too-risky-to-move infra stays with DXC to slowly run down over next 5-10 years.

That's why DXC is shrinking quarter on quarter but not so quickly it will disappear anytime soon. Its also a reflection on the failure of the IT industry as a whole to migrate everything to cloud, some legacy apps and infra make more sense being left where they are, until they are ultimately replaced outright rather than risk migrations

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jghqj1g3

Post a reply

: