Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

This is why transformations don't work at Intel

Transformations only work if all causes of problems are identified at all levels. Unfortunately, what happens is lots of blame at the bottom workers and some lower layers of management, while direction and management issues in the VP/C-suite are dismissed or ignored. Most of the time big company-wide problems are the fault of c-suite, and since c-suite doesnt accept responsibility of their failures and demands, you end up with the same stuff coming from above handled by newer employees below who adopt the BKMs, and the cycle continues.

Originally posted by @gxo+1ja54WR6, I hope he or she doesn't mind the repost.

by
| 1624 views | | 5 replies (last October 14, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jbcmwJ3

5 replies (most recent on top)

"As long as you have a disproportionate Indian population and Indian managers, it will never work. Unable to execution, Intel is done."

You'd think the minorities wouldn't stereotype each other, but no.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dko+1jbcmwJ3

As long as you have a disproportionate Indian population and Indian managers, it will never work. Unable to execution, Intel is done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1svb+1jbcmwJ3

Diversity and Inclusiveness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ioh+1jbcmwJ3

See layoff in 2016 management fired. See kransanwich ex ceo firing no golden parachute. Please learn to google before making yourself a fool.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pbo+1jbcmwJ3

C-suite come and go. They should take responsibility but the middle management and tech leaders should take the most blame. For a high tech company to succeed, like early Intel in its glory, they should be first rate engineers, but what we have now are mostly 2nd rate, or worse, bozos. Have you ever met gfx Fellows and VPs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mrs+1jbcmwJ3

Post a reply

: