Thread regarding Seagate Technology Inc. layoffs

Every Direct Report to Mosely had to Cut 2 VPs minimum

At the executive level almost 20% of VPs were impacted. At least this is what our SVP told us.

by
| 3811 views | | 11 replies (last December 16, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jLagEMG

11 replies (most recent on top)

Senior Leadership had a change of heart and reduced the number of executives impacted. New cost analysis showed that it is cheaper to cut more working level people or/and their salaries than to payoff expensive executive separation packages. Executives are the heart of the company. Employees are replaceable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sgmr+1jLagEMG

The COO ? That’s where the greatest wastage in the company is…the Ops team not on the factory floor needs to be slashed by 75%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ddke+1jLagEMG

Business Excellence should be removed as an executive branch, placed under the COO, and renamed Operational Management Systems. It should have one non-executive VP level leader. There, I just saved Seagate another 100 million a year. Your welcome.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @doya+1jLagEMG

So, when are they going to cut the VPs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cqhd+1jLagEMG

LOL. A lot Snr engineer are blocked in their promotion to Staff engineer. It's really hard to imagine to hold Snr Engineer without promotion for 10+ years anywhere else. But it seems this is really common in Seagate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ucf+1jLagEMG

Seagate has more VPs and above than the USA has states.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zxc+1jLagEMG

Huge layoff early 2023 highly likely.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gxv+1jLagEMG

lol. I mean look at how many VPs are in operations (esp wafer). I chuckle every time a sr director gets a VP position, and the existing VP gets moved into a made up SVP, and that person reports to EVP. I mean, do you see how often good engineers are passed on yearly promotions, but we magically have $$ to promote these reshuffles every six months?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xqv+1jLagEMG

Given the current volume, lesser new product, even cut 50% vp , this is still ok, In fact more efficient as lesser vp, lesser meeting and report, more work done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lzi+1jLagEMG

VPs, still got SVPs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @llw+1jLagEMG

Still not enough when you have VPs reporting to VPs reporting to VPs...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ype+1jLagEMG

Post a reply

: