Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

CCUS

What are your thoughts on CCUS and is it a viable future?

by
| 2341 views | | 14 replies (last September 9, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iotoA62

14 replies (most recent on top)

To be fair, they just had an announcement for more Aus blocks today, have started multiple projects in SJV, have a real project in TX offshore, and are invested in a tech company. It’s Hydrogen that hasn’t done anything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fetj+1iotoA62

CP is only interested in publicity……..lots of “look at me” workday and linked in posts……deliver something man!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eics+1iotoA62

I bet this thread was started by CP to gauge how important he is in the organization LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cjok+1iotoA62

CCUS has basically saved CTC workwise - they are all over it, despite knowing nothing whatsoever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6gvy+1iotoA62

CTC is writing boat loads of manuals on CCUS without anyone knowing nothing in real life

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6vpa+1iotoA62

For the time being I’d focus on those carbon molecules we extract from the ground, they’re the ones actually making money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ctw+1iotoA62

CCUS right now is on capturing CO2 and injecting it underground with the hope that it stays there for long time. This might work for certain geological formation and within certain distance with the right surface facilities or transport lines. Another approach to all of this, while not practical yet, is to mimic photosynthesis on a large industrial basis using biotechnology and gene mutations. This can alter the game to something far more attractive as the product would be generating abundant food and saving the world and many hungry around the world. I am not sure when the technology becomes economic and possible on large scale, but that would be something I see CCUS to be useful and address both climate change and world hunger, ki----g 2 birds with 1 stone, maybe in the next 25 years or so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fea+1iotoA62

If Gorgon has taught us anything, it is that we don’t know squat about CCUS. It has been and continues to be an unmitigated fiasco despite being the most studies and reviewed project ever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lex+1iotoA62

I think the pilots they are deploying are for the next generation of capture technologies, which need to be cheaper to capture more streams of CO2 in the future. They have recently done a couple of learning sessions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3aah+1iotoA62

Easiest way would be to capture CO2 from high producing CO2 industries like cements, refineries, and steel production. Then It could be used for enhanced recovery.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mwd+1iotoA62

Expensive, impractical, and inefficient. The technology has been around for decades yet its still rarely done. I laugh when I hear about a CCUS pilot. WTF! Why do we need to pilot established technology?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbl+1iotoA62

We need a breakthrough soon to allow it to work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mth+1iotoA62

It is the silver bullet that the world would need to maintain the current western lifestyle that developing countries also want. But it will still take ccus in conjunction with other major efficiency and technology gains to achieve a sustainable environment with the projected increase in world population

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oyh+1iotoA62

"Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs" ??????

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @emb+1iotoA62

Post a reply

: