At Intel, we love our data and celebrate data driven decisions. With this as the ethos of the company, and as a meritocracy, then shouldn't our CEO be on a performance improvement plan (PIP)?
Here is the data: according to SEC filings, Intel CEO Pat G. was paid over $160 million in the first year. Pat's first day as CEO, Intel stock traded in the $60s/share ($61+). Today, even with a US government's multibillion dollar "investment" via the CHIPS Act, Intel stock is trading in the $20s (~$29/share)! These are the facts.
This is Peloton type performance.
So ... what is going on with Intel leadership? Is there CEO level accountability for a 50%+ decline in stock price and a loss of of $100 Billion in market cap? If anyone anywhere should be on a PIP, how could it not be Pat?