Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

Founding principles abandoned

Quality used to be a thing before DXC. CSC Delivery, time, cost, quality. DXC took over and changed the balance scorecard to global financial, regional financial and reduced the customer qualitative bits and bonused the execs on, what one can only assume were losses - until the shareholders veto'd that trend. The original principles upon which the company were originally formed on, have long since been buried. What you have now is just an empty shell; a sweat shop with no direction. Shame really.

Pulled this from +1g65nslA. Nicely said! Unfortunately, I don't think there is a way back?

by
| 1931 views | | 4 replies (last April 21, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1geB0dqx

4 replies (most recent on top)

One good thing came out of all this outsourcing split / merger / acquisition BS is HP brand the respectable icon of silicon valley is safe in the hands of HP and HPE - and both guys are moving forward in the right direction! While the CSC eds and hp services are all going, you know where... Long live the HP brand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8zxg+1geB0dqx

@2tff+1geB0dqx true but under M1 quality dived but WFR and letting go off experienced staff shot up; leaving DXC in sorry state it is in now

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6nax+1geB0dqx

Quality used to be a thing?

If you are old enough to remember.... Quality died a death in CSC with the first wave of offshoring.

Turns out quality isn't what the customer wants - well, they do, but what they REALLY want is cheapness.

That was long before M1 turned up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tff+1geB0dqx

The biggest problem with DXC, and the thing that's led to the most layoffs and to the most clients leaving, is the endless focus on in quarter results. I know Wall St loves to see in quarter results announced, but to only focus on a 3-month window is really not the way to run a sustainable business.

Want to boost current quarter? Simple, lay off some staff - that gets costs down without hitting revenue in quarter. Of course, it hits revenue in the next quarter as you now have fewer staff to sell to clients, but that's easily fixed by laying off some more staff in the next quarter! And this cycle has repeated at DXC for several years.

Don't spend on training and development, because that reduces your in-quarter profit. The very training and development that's necessary to keep your teams relevant for future quarters. But, hey, as the teams no longer have relevant skills, DXC can lay them off too and boost the in-quarter results.

Short sighted Leadership by Mike v1.0 and Mike v2.0. There was a way back when Mike 2.0 took over, had he acted immediately to shift the focus of the company, but he didn't. He went for more of the same.

I don't think there's a way back now, too much damage has been done to DXC's reputation. A purple re-brand isn't going to fool anyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hxa+1geB0dqx

Post a reply

: