Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Ten Hadjis at $15,000 per year is far better

Than one Johnny Quest at $200,000. Unfortunately striving for short term numbers has always been ATT's undoing. It's a low return junk bond investment at this point with all that debt.

by
| 1551 views | | 8 replies (last December 21, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1efAq7Lg

8 replies (most recent on top)

stankey makes 84 grand per day - in two days he makes more than most employees make all year

someone please tell me what it is he does on any given day that is worth 84 grand for the day?

Jason Killar made over 50 million last year - and he achieved what? a late to market hbo max and over priced

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aush+1efAq7Lg

Let's be honest and call it what it is. AT&T has to keep current employee costs low to afford the excessive benefits promised to the retirees. It's the same path our entire nation is taking now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5zsl+1efAq7Lg

and boost mobile moves to #3

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lth+1efAq7Lg

Hadji had a little lamb, her fleece was white as snow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ngm+1efAq7Lg

What is a Hadji?

If your computer can not be repaired remotely, AT&T will have you go to an IQ bar similar location to fix your company issued computer. If you don't know what a Hadji or Sanjeet is now, you will see the "diversity" that AT&T promotes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ufx+1efAq7Lg

This is the Toxic T way for decades. I recall a LWD conference where is was stated "Unemployment is India is of great concern to AT&T".

Unemployment in the US is of no consequence to the M O R O Ns in charge - except if they were unemployed! I am surprised the Stink did not yet rename ATT to ITT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qme+1efAq7Lg

Best hope for shareholders at this point is for att to be bought by another company. Who would want this garbage though ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sqc+1efAq7Lg

or are you saying Johnny quest blonde hair blue eye guy is overrated, over-payed and not worth 200k?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ksp+1efAq7Lg

Post a reply

: