Thread regarding IBM layoffs

How IBM Messed Up Cloud

Protocol.com/enterprise/ibm-lost-public-cloud

by
| 3233 views | | 20 replies (last December 1, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1dSz3hYW

20 replies (most recent on top)

I worked on IBM Cloud and it was quite sh-t. SoftLayer wasn't too bad initially, but the beancounters stripped the whole thing down and the PaaS only get as good as the IaaS. It was so bad, that some internal teams moved to AWS/Azure from IBM "Cloud". My PTSD is triggered when I hear IBM and Cloud in connotation

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @diqt+1dSz3hYW

@7fms+1dSz3hYW - snake-oil marketing... 😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8awm+1dSz3hYW

Hybrid was/is a 'sit on the fence' approach to:

a. see where the market is going (ie: follow)
b. milk every dime from legacy while dangling a cloud carrot to 'stay relevant'
c. spend gazillions in snake-oil marketing
d. rinse/repeat the above while we hire some 'cloud guys' to show us the way
e. give up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7fms+1dSz3hYW

IBM no longer compete in Cloud... why do you think it is slowly but sure removing the word Cloud from everywhere... Just wait until the CLOUDPaks are renamed... it is coming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4zsh+1dSz3hYW

🤣 IBM reports anything they sell as cloud. The real number is less than a billion 😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qbv+1dSz3hYW

Again with the misinformation on this site... Hilarious how sore people get on here when it's not completely relentlessly negative like normal. IBM takes in 26B a year in cloud. Say whatever but that's a large number. The idea that they're dead is ridiculous. Oh no, here come the downvotes! Booooo..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ltd+1dSz3hYW

wait ..... i thought this was one of their "strategic imperatives" ?

What a complete shambles.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3euz+1dSz3hYW

I am sure Arvind will fix that misunderstanding…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3cff+1dSz3hYW

So the Pentagon is going multi-cloud...? But not inviting IBM/Red Hat? This just keeps getting worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ykp+1dSz3hYW

It looks like anyone but IBM can bid on pentagon cloud

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/19/pentagon-asks-amazon-google-microsoft-oracle-for-cloud-bids.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wwt+1dSz3hYW

You can invest tens of billions of dollars into building cloud data centers, fiber connections between them, and new software that runs on them or you can spend it on dividends and stock buybacks. Amazon, MS, and Google chose the former while IBM chose the latter. And here we are.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ejg+1dSz3hYW

First place? Last place? We showed up very late to the biggest race in a decade, with no good excuse, and in a sport where we used to make all the rules. Pathetic management complacency, and the rest of the sport is now not even offering us any registration forms for future races.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zyh+1dSz3hYW

"So if you're not first place you should just quit? I love the message folks on the forum send to our children. Hey, if you aren't in the lead, just give up. "If you ain't first you're last!"

If you are debating the "IBM Cloud" is somehow in last place, you are missing the point. It isn't in any place. IBM doesn't have to quit. It plain lost and is dead. It is why they are trying to play the Hybrid Game now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ldt+1dSz3hYW

So if you're not first place you should just quit? I love the message folks on the forum send to our children. Hey, if you aren't in the lead, just give up. "If you ain't first you're last!"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jgr+1dSz3hYW

INCIDENT - SEVERITY 1 - EVERY IBM CLOUD EMAIL
SEVERITY: SEVERITY 1
REGIONS: EVERY SINGLE ONE, EVERY TIME
DESCRIPTION...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jgc+1dSz3hYW

The same issues that sunk IBM's cloud will be the same issues that sink Red Hat. Namely poor leadership and inability to remove that leadership for extended periods of time, short term financial optimization (burning the furniture), fantasy marketing rather than investing in reality, internally focused/poor customer service, creating an army of enemy former employees/customers rather than an extended alumni sales branch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zue+1dSz3hYW

Sears use to be one of IBM’s largest customers. Both made the same mistakes! Now they are both no longer relevant. So fu----g sad 😢.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgp+1dSz3hYW

The end for IBM as a great company… it will have now to fight hard to avoid total obsolescence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ktu+1dSz3hYW

They're "all in on RH w/hybrid cloud" remember.
Too bad customers don't feel the same way.
What's the next big hype they will jump on the bandwagon?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkw+1dSz3hYW

Good article; good summation.

I especially like the very last line: ".... its inability to capitalize on that historic shift was a huge strategic oversight — and one that has left its status as an American technology icon hanging in the balance."

Hey, does anyone remember Sears, Roebuck and Co.? Anyone? Anyone?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fmd+1dSz3hYW

Post a reply

: