Thread regarding CenturyLink layoffs

Appeals Court Halts Roll-Out of Biden’s Vax Mandate fr Businesses

example.com/7428a6cr

by
| 2591 views | | 11 replies (last November 11, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1dGARe9F

11 replies (most recent on top)

Let's hope you don't catch it and die....

99% chance those who are unvaccinated will survive. Not much better for those who are vaccinated. I’d say odds are pretty decent for either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5lzz+1dGARe9F

@5eaf+1dGARe9F Let's hope you don't catch it and die....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5vsh+1dGARe9F

#donotcomply I called this out 9 days ago on the "why wait to be fired" thread when I said wait for the lawsuits. Don't be sheep, don't rush to the poke. We still have liberty, somewhat. Don't let them shame you into taking an experimental dr-g with no liability that may harm you and does not stop the spread. Why you think they pushed the date out? They know it's going to fall apart. If it's such a safety hazard, everyone dying cause of the unvaxxed then why push the dates? No joke fuxx the poke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5eaf+1dGARe9F

I think Brandon will win this one. I read that long a.s vaccine rule, and he is not forcing anyone. You can either get vaccinated or test 2x a week. Truck drivers are claiming they won, but the rule said those who work alone are omitted. Truck drivers with 2 or more in a cab would need to be Vaxed. It's not a complete force from OSHA. Only VAX if you work with others OR get tested 2x a week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qxo+1dGARe9F
“The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them,” Nanda stated. “We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”<<

The key phrase here is "grave danger". Covid doesn't qualify as a grave danger in the workplace. Lawyer Robert Barnes said there have been 10 previous Emergency Temporary Standards issued by OSHA. 9 of the 10 were thrown out by the courts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1obn+1dGARe9F

@1shj+1dGARe9F a judge cannot make this ruling until there's a lawsuit, a lawsuit can't be filed until the mandate was official. So I don't see the timing as suspect.

The bigger question is why Brandon changed the date from 12/8 to 1/4, cuz if the holidays were affected he would look even worse than he already does.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jov+1dGARe9F

Really,
This might seem like a win but it’s not. All part of the plan. The big retailers and corporations don’t want their yearly gravy train messed with.
The courts are NOW all of a sudden thinking clearly and saving the American Worker?
Follow The Money........

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shj+1dGARe9F

Everyone asking why let them fire you…. This is why.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyj+1dGARe9F

Blind man could have seen this coming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cby+1dGARe9F

November 06, 2021 at 1:30 pm PDT
By Bob D'Angelo, Cox Media Group National Content Desk
NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court in Louisiana on Saturday issued a temporary halt to President Joe Biden’s coronavirus vaccine mandate for businesses with 100 or more employees.

The three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued the brief ruling, saying the petitioners “give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the mandate,” The New York Times reported.

The order was signed by a deputy clerk and said the rule was suspended “pending further action by this court,” the newspaper reported.

Earlier this week, the Biden administration announced that it would require businesses with 100 or more workers to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or submit to regular testing by Jan. 4. The administration announced that it would issue the law through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in September.

OSHA’s rule includes sending agents to inspect businesses to determine if they are abiding by the mandate, The Hill reported. A business found to be in violation could be fined up to $136,532, the news organization reported.

The mandate was expected to cover 84 million workers, the Times reported. Approximately 31 million of those workers are not vaccinated, the newspaper reported.

At least 26 states have opposed the administration’s mandate, and several groups of states filed four challenges to the OSHA rule.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said the action stops Biden “from moving forward with his unlawful overreach.”

“ The president will not impose medical procedures on the American people without the checks and balances afforded by the constitution,” Landry said in a statement.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton celebrated the legal victory on Twitter, with Texas having Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah in their coalition to fight back against the mandate.

“Yesterday, I sued the Biden administration over its unlawful OSHA vax mandate,” Paxton tweeted. “We won. Just this morning, citing ‘grave statutory and constitutional issues,’ the 5th Circuit stayed the mandate. The fight is not over and I will never stop resisting this administration’s unconstitutional overreach.”

Seema Nanda, the chief legal officer for the U.S. Department of Labor, said in a statement that the government was confident in its legal authority to issue the mandate, according to the Times.

“The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them,” Nanda stated. “We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iet+1dGARe9F

example.com/7428a6cr

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mgc+1dGARe9F

Post a reply

: