Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

COO - "can we act like a technology company?" WTF?

Drongoole said this when talking about the downsized Tyson office:

“As I joined just under two years ago…we were really stepping back and saying, ‘Hey, what do we want the future of the company to be and how do we want to attract talent, what do we think our footprint should be environmentally, kind of like the big picture. We’re a technology company at heart and can we act like one?'

Can we act like one? You id--t. How about being one? And if we are not a technology company now, what is DXC? A toxic dump? A dying dinosaur? An executive get rich quick scheme? A mid-twentieth century technology museum?

The answer to Drongoole question is "given we can't actually be a technology company with inarticulate halfwits like you at the helm, we'll have to keep on pretending to be one while you and the rest of the exec get rich driving us into the ground"

by
| 2291 views | | 1 reply (September 30, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1d5Mqspm

1 reply

DXC / CSC was a fairly good technical company prior to Mikey one coming on board then a decline downward with frequent WFR, offshoring jobs to lower cost centre, not able delivering a good enough service for client to leave. With Lawrie's broken leadership under DXC and him walking way with few million $$, Sal 2 had chance to stop the rot, make strong changes and turn things around. Unfortunately nothing change apart from small reversal for time being of the share price, expect Sal to leave as CEO in next 2-3 years with plenty of $$

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zso+1d5Mqspm

Post a reply

: