And how can this company get it back?
Credibility is one thing that is easy to lose, but hard to regain. In fact, it should be a crucial thing. On the other hand, I sometimes wonder if Intel knows its customers well and what their expectations are, or if it cares about its credibility at all.
5 replies (most recent on top)
@4tau+1c1yfAAn All I can say is the acceleration of smoke and mirror is bordering on outright boasting, but the king has no clothes, and everyone from the press to technology experts don’t want to ask the hard questions and ask them what really changed! Boasting about doing more faster when the last five years they failed over and over while promising far less. People like the story so they accept the lies
Good talking, a lot of promises, impressive at presentation. That's the Intel leaders attributes. Maybe years before product/solution launch.
BUT, in reality down the road later, it turns out to miss delivery, customer facing lots of unexpected issues and bad experience that cost Intel to loose out to its competitors
Mostly Indians
I generally like Pat, but I was shocked by those roadmaps.
Stop promising things and then failing to deliver those things on time. That is the #1 credibility ki---r and Intel has been doing it for years across many product lines. We miss more deadlines than we meet. Intel is even catastrophically late in delivering on a firm contract, in Aurora.
Either promise and deliver (the ideal), or shut up and announce things when they’re ready.
Worryingly, since Pat came back the promising has been getting even more out of hand.