Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

How far have intel fallen, only will fall further

Pat’s great return to IDM 2.0 and beats his chest about 20 billion investment, must be a real man with a fab.

Oops he has awoken the giant who is REALLY going to spend a HUNDRED BILLION.

Pat likely can’t even get his first EUV till 2024, LOL

by
| 2088 views | | 6 replies (last April 5, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aad1XRP

6 replies (most recent on top)

if you are technology leader, do you think do you want your competitor to manufacture your device and potential IP leak?
unless there a cash incentives from Intel to guarantee the investment & the so-called customer is not a technology leader, so it has nothing to lose
Apple learning from Samsung design/fab for their mobile app processor was a learning to everyone

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lfl+1aad1XRP

Fab business with many customers always win like TSMC be prepare to work to work at Intel
Intel want 100% IPC to make up the delay of advanced node

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bel+1aad1XRP

TSMC doesn’t build capacity without high confidence they have orders and a technology to fill it.

Unlike Intel who’s 20 billion was all PR. 10nm years late, 7nm the same, well know. Terrible execution and customer service. Who wants or needs a lagging low confidence high cost technology from an also ran. Let’s not forget he told everyone he want sit compete with you, who needs or wants a frenemy like that ?

Even government will find better places to throw money, BTW how much money did Intel make and they are asking for tax payer money ?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-01/tsmc-to-invest-100-billion-over-three-years-to-grow-capacity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rla+1aad1XRP

And the US government is now talking about 50 billion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hfe+1aad1XRP

What are you saying OP? Who is spending 100 billion? TSMC? Where?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yjx+1aad1XRP

I had that thought too. So should be $200 billion not $20 billion, to catch up to TSMC who is already ahead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qwx+1aad1XRP

Post a reply

: