Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

Am I at risk?

I've noticed that layoffs seem to be focusing on people who've been here for a while rather than those who are more recent additions. Is this true? Does that mean that I'm safe if I've only been here for little over a year? I know this is probably wishful thinking on my part but I have to ask.

by
| 3851 views | | 13 replies (last February 14, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+199qvdof

13 replies (most recent on top)

I voluntarily retired in 2015 & can’t believe how much worse things must be there now in 2021. It will say after working at multi smaller cos 2016-2021 the 30 yrs at COP I now refer to as my cupcake years! Plan on working ur butt off at the smaller cos if hired
Any co hiring now plan on stepping into a sh.t show. FYI only.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gdfd+199qvdof

Troll post - nobody knows yet who is being let go or who submitted an EoI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7pos+199qvdof

The cuts this time are going to be biblical. If you’re in Exploration, you’re already dead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3eye+199qvdof

Everyone is at risk. No one is safe. Unless your initials are RL.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hua+199qvdof

Demotions = pay cuts and that’s a real possibility. Less supervisors means some will become individual contributors at a lower SGL. What are your options in this market?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yek+199qvdof

What a place. Too fat for too long. I was at Surmont for 5 years and the waste of money on some S1 guys. Big boys club no more. Bag licking is over

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2shd+199qvdof

There haven't been any layoffs YET. So how could you say that the 'layoffs seem to be focusing on people who've been here for a while rather than those who are more recent additions' I smell someone fishing!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hcb+199qvdof

Regarding layoffs, there are only two factors: blind loyalty, and a “sponsor”. If someone successful up the chain is covering for you, you are safe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gnf+199qvdof

The previous post requires a clarification...

Stay: 0% paycut
Go: 100% paycut

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1evl+199qvdof

Some are taking pay cuts as well to be able to stay!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frr+199qvdof

Less years in service means less payout when they let you go. Experience is important if they want to keep the company above water. This round, being a junior employee is probably no guarantee of safety.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zmx+199qvdof

Unfortunately, I don’t think we can say we are safe. No matter if you have been 1-10 or 20
Years with the company.

It is okey to be stress, we will know and feel better in a month. Hang in there

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cbj+199qvdof

For every older person they layoff, they have to layoff a younger person so that the average age is below a threshold or the EEOC will be knocking at the door for age discrimination. Everyone below SGL 20 is at risk. It is more of a factor of what skill set is needed to fill a position. When given the choice between two equal candidates, the will pick the one that makes less money. They have laid off new hires in the past, but the less money you make, the safer you are. IMHO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ttq+199qvdof

Post a reply

: