Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Trolls on both sides

anyone noticed there are trolls both for and against in each conversation? wonder if there are WF peeps hired to spread misinformation.... or is there just peeps that love to rustle feathers for kicks and giggles?

by
| 1661 views | | 16 replies (last December 5, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18eYIDvI

16 replies (most recent on top)

No

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2iuj+18eYIDvI

Yes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tjh+18eYIDvI

I doubt any actual Wells HR folks were posting, but PR firms hired by Wells would.

This is a bad place to post good things about Wells, given that we come here to find out if we're going to get layed off, and in light of all the F''''''n criming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zss+18eYIDvI

I think we might have been seeing some Corp Comm posts for a while. They were corporate-speak, but they were professional in nature. But I don’t think HR is involved, because the “seemingly positive posts” are actually quite toxic and divisive. Anyone who is really attempting to convince employees to give Charlie and the new regime a chance would be written more intelligently and objectively.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xnb+18eYIDvI

@dhk+18eYIDvI

If you honestly believe Wells HR has people coming on here to post positive stuff then you are an id–t

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wfi+18eYIDvI

yes please keep the conversations positive and don't forget-

"When they go low, we go high"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1smv+18eYIDvI

It’s well understood that HR has people trolling here to say positive about the place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dhk+18eYIDvI

Trolls are everywhere on the internet. My advice is don’t feed the trolls and they go away. These are people obviously in need of attention I assume they don’t get elsewhere that enjoy the anonymity of the keyboard because they will never say these things to people’s faces.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dry+18eYIDvI

Ot layoff related

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eix+18eYIDvI

Post ID: @spl+18eYIDvI I don’t actually want to troll you. But it is your “superior” attitude that renders you ineffective and unable to persuade people that your way is the right way. You are potentially as bad for the organization as the outspoken negative employees, IMO, because you don’t carry yourself as a team-player either. I don’t know if it is your intention, but you come across as someone who enjoys judging shaming and blaming, rather than someone who is actually trying to help Wells Fargo become a better organization. Equally manipulative and toxic, just in a different way.
Someone who is truly a valuable employee is able to work within the organization to turn the tide. I’ve seen you get that feedback before and yet you continue in the same vein, which is what makes you come across as young and self-interested.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wea+18eYIDvI

@pzg+18eYIDvI

Been working here for more than 10 years.

Wells has a lot of problems. But they are all fixable.

What is ridiculous is the number of employees pulling a salary every day yet come on here just to bash wells cos they are scared their comfy jobs are going to be taken away.

People like that are everywhere in wells. Charlie is doing what needs to be done. Just as Moynihan did at BOA.

One employee came and posted here to the effect of “I missed the benefits deadline and I am annoyed the company didn’t send me enough reminders...”

Another wants to report his managers manager to the ethics line all of a sudden for playing golf years ago...

It goes and on and on with employees whining and projecting their bad attitudes and problems on to wells

Ok now go ahead and proceed to troll and flame me. I won’t read or respond cos I have work to do for wells. I work hard and earn my pay, a trait that died around here a long time ago...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @spl+18eYIDvI

We have 1, possibly 2, newer Wells Fargo employees on here who don’t know or understand or care about the last 5 years of mis-management and how that has negatively impacted employees. I think they will understand more as they continue working here. It is similar to the gal who falls for a cheating married man. She thinks the current wife doesn’t understand him and she’s got herself quite a prize because she is going to treat him right. Until he cheats on her.

Aside from the above 2, the other supposedly “pro-WFC” commenters are pure trolls who don’t work here and are just trying to stir it up. Don’t get it, but I just ignore them. I don’t even give them the satisfaction of a downtick.

Additionally, we have some people who will ridiculously argue any point. To what end? I have no clue.

OP: “That tree is beautiful.”

Reply #1: “ Old news, you id–t.”
Reply #2: “Trees are worthless and I hate raking stupid leaves.”
Rely #3: “Uhhh that is a sapling, not a tree 🙄.”
Reply #4: “Newsflash. All trees are replaceable.”
Reply #5: “Too many trees. The old trees need to go and make room for the new trees.”
Reply #6: “Who cares about trees during a pandemic?”
Reply #7: “Go away liberal tree hugger.”
Reply #8: “To all the tree haters - Just leave!! Waah!”
Reply #9: “Folks, Trees are here for a reason. Good or bad, trees are here to stay.”
Reply #10: “Trolls are coming from other boards and trying to discredit trees.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pzg+18eYIDvI

@mlo

So after looking at the data you have come to the conclusion we are not making enough money...

That’s genius!! You should email the CEO immediately and ask him if he realizes that...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @spx+18eYIDvI

@lba

Poor attempt at trolling.

The data indicates to me that WF is doing a poor job of earning. The number of people isnt the problem they just aren't profitable enough.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mlo+18eYIDvI

I can confirm that I was hired by WF to monitor this site as well as others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fjb+18eYIDvI

The data from CSI Market is irrefutable in that it proves we have too many people for the amount of money we generate as a firm as compared to other firms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lba+18eYIDvI

Post a reply

: