Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Did I get this right?

The only people who have not been notified yet are those on vacation/sick leave? If that's true, I have to admit I'm positively surprised. I was concerned they would really make all of us worry and stress for two full weeks while they slowly notified everybody on the list. Not sure what brought on this change, but I welcome it.

by
| 2967 views | | 14 replies (last December 6, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18e8wM1f

14 replies (most recent on top)

A form deadline has been put out. You won’t believe some of the situations people have been in when they were told.

Hey Jim. Glad I caught you before you go into surgery for removing that brain tumor. Just wanted to let you know you are fired. Thanks. Hey let me know if I can do anything for ya. We’re all in this together after all. Oh and good luck with the surgery. -click (hangs up)-

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3twc+18e8wM1f

Went out on paternity leave...PIP'd 2 months later without warning. lack of long-term fit, mismatch company values, etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yfh+18e8wM1f

It was the same in Clinton and Paulsboro as well: female employee goes out on maternity leave, comes back nine months later with a promotion and a better job

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ery+18e8wM1f

@2ipl+18e8wM1f Solid advice and your observations mirror my experience.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2myf+18e8wM1f

Paternity leave = not protected if male
Maternity leave = protected and was mentioned during corporate plan process (look around on intranet)

Usually after an extended time off on maternity leave if CL24 or higher will return to an equivalent or bump up role. Has been a trend for years. Look at the announcement pages, someone leaves for maternity, 6-12 months later they are back at a higher role.

In Baytown, if you speak up at all and it’s not in line with DH level and up people then you’re branded and will be until that DH is gone.
There’s a few DHs that hold grudges and will constantly influence people’s ranking even if they don’t have direct working relationship with you.
This also works the opposite way, if the DH or above person likes you, that person will be your (sponsor) until they leave the site.

At that point they can’t influence as heavily. Could be months or years just depends.
You hope the higher the person goes in the company, the more unbiased and level headed they become, sadly that is not the case with many.

So keep your heads down while you look around, have a plan B just in case.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ipl+18e8wM1f

I always wonder why being on leave or family situation should be a factor? I can understand delaying telling them if something awful just happened to them but if a person you need to fire is on leave why would you fire someone else instead?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yky+18e8wM1f

People on maternity and paternity leave were NOT protected. In fact, a married couple who just had a baby and were both on maternity and paternity leave were both let go. Very heartless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mpn+18e8wM1f

What about short term and long term disability? Are those employees being protected while still in disability?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dvc+18e8wM1f

Several people on parental leave have been let go - there is no protection.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zgj+18e8wM1f

Notifications were done via phone zoom etc

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mzd+18e8wM1f

Those on maternity leave are protected.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hwt+18e8wM1f

Working from home doesn’t matter. They’ll zoom with you to lay you off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kfw+18e8wM1f

What about those working from home this week? Would that cause a delay in notifying the employee they have been selected?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ari+18e8wM1f

What I have also seen floating around in the intranet is People who are on maternity leave.

Which actually kinda protects the person, usually when someone leaves for a few months on maternity leave, they come back to a promotion?
Not always the case but often.
At least in Baytown

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kws+18e8wM1f

Post a reply

: