Thread regarding IBM layoffs

Microsoft's Creepy New 'Productivity Score' Gamifies Workplace Surveillance

Microsoft's Creepy New 'Productivity Score' Gamifies Workplace Surveillance ... are criticizing the company for essentially gamifying workplace surveillance.

https://gizmodo.com/microsofts-creepy-new-productivity-score-gamifies-workp-1845763063


Microsoft's Creepy New 'Productivity Score' Gamifies Workplace Surveillance
Microsoft rolled out its new “Productivity Score” feature this month, which lets bosses track how their employees use Microsoft’s suite of tools. If that sounds like an Orwellian nightmare in the making to you, you’re not alone—privacy experts are criticizing the company for essentially gamifying workplace surveillance.
When Microsoft first announced the feature in October, the company billed it as a way to provide “insights that transform how work gets done” to employers. To do this, the tool gathers data on each employee’s behavior across 73 metrics and presents a handy-dandy breakdown to their bosses at the end of each month, Forbes reports.
These metrics include how often workers turn their cameras on during virtual meetings, how frequently they send emails (and how many contain @ mentions), whether they regularly contribute to shared documents or group chats, and the number of days they used Microsoft’s tools such as Word, Excel, Skype, Outlook, or Teams in the last month, just to name a few. Microsoft lays out all the ways it monitors you through its office suite in the company’s own documentation, though admittedly you’ll have to go digging through about a dozen web pages to find them.
Microsoft 365's corporate VP Jared Spataro specified in a blog post that the feature, which debuted to little fanfare on Nov. 17, is “not a work monitoring tool” and that Microsoft has incorporated several security measures to demonstrate its commitment to privacy. For example, every employee’s productivity score is aggregated over a 28-day period, and there are privacy controls available to anonymize that data or remove it completely.
Of course, what Spataro conveniently fails to mention is that only an administrator, aka your boss, can access those controls in the first place, which is zero comfort for any employee justifiably concerned about potential invasions of privacy. In a statement to Guardian, a Microsoft spokesperson echoed this pretense of choice, calling the feature “an opt-in experience” even though workers aren’t the ones who can decide whether to opt-in.
Privacy experts are understandably p-ss-d to see blatant workplace surveillance repackaged as a productivity optimization tool, and one with a cutesy game-themed “score” design no less. David Heinemeier Hansson, co-founder of the office suite Basecamp, described the feature’s design as “morally bankrupt at its core” in a series of tweets this week.
Data privacy researcher Wolfie Christl, who called the feature “problematic at many levels,” pointed out that while Microsoft offers employers the option to turn off employee monitoring, it’s enabled by default when they first boot up Microsoft 365. He added that Microsoft’s new tool may even be illegal in some European Union countries given the region’s strict regulations on how companies can access user data.
“One way to crystalize just how creepy this scheme is is by imagining a person with a stopwatch and a clipboard sitting behind you. Meticulously recording how long you spend on each task, compiling a dossier on everyone doing the same, then reporting the findings to management,” he said.
Workplace surveillance has become a particularly prevalent concern this year with the pandemic pushing more and more people to work from home. In June, the research firm Gartner found that 16% of employers were using monitoring tools more frequently to track their workers’ computer usage, internal communications, and engagement among other data. And with coronavirus cases continuing to climb to record heights in the U.S., experts expect the development and adoption of these tools to only ramp up further.
Gizmodo weekend editor. Freelance games reporter. Full-time disaster bi.
Goddamn, the Simpsons predicted the solution to Micro$oft’s b—s— productivity monitoring.
by
| 2863 views | | 5 replies (last November 27, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+188ELxls

5 replies (most recent on top)

When people feel insecure, they try to fall back to their core competency. Let’s keep this post jargon free.
Microsoft Affinity Score (Productivity score?)
Surprise, surprise! Microsoft has chosen to fall back to its strength again: Office apps or productivity applications as they are called these days. When collaboration software products like Zoom, Box and Slack began to threaten the market share of MSFT, the latter responded by launching a measurement system called productivity score. Maximum attainable value of this score is 800, let the race begin. (cough, CIBIL TransUnion score, cough cough)
Check out the recent AMA here: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-365- ama/bd-p/microsoft365ama
The productivity score creates fatal addiction to the Microsoft’s walled garden of software applications. The final score of each employee is arrived at by measuring the usage of products under Office 365 like SharePoint, Skype, Yammer, Teams, Office products including OneDrive. I think we should call it Microsoft Affinity Score instead of productivity score. Take an example. If Jessica uses only one tool for collaborating within her organisation, she will get a poorer score. She can however increase her productivity score by increasing the number of tools she uses to communicate.
So why am I putting up this post? As Microsoft embeds Teams with Office to attract corporate users, organisations need to be diligent while using proprietary products. Azure ML services will improve significantly after ingesting this data which traditionally used to stay behind an organisation’s firewall. At that juncture, organisations will be locked into an ecosystem. Organisations may find themselves able to migrate some or all of the data to a rival, but they will face high inertia to maintain status-quo from their stakeholders. That will reveal something that was popularised by Prof Scott G and Kara S in their popular podcast. Bundle. Rundle. A recurring bundle of products and services.
Enterprises when locked into rundle tend to pay more than the expected investment of building a product. I recommend that such organisations, though few in number, should focus on creating in-house AI solutions for the purpose of measuring usage of tools and platforms, and consequently, productivity.
Pluses for Microsoft: this exit barrier mechanism will bring incremental revenue to MSFT. Office already contributes to $46.4 billion productivity and business processes segment compared to $48.37 billion from Intelligent cloud and $48.25 billion from personal computing. This segment despite showing growth of 17% in FY20 Q2 was a laggard to Intelligent Cloud which grew by 27% in the same period.
Unsure of how this might pan out: in future, Microsoft might offer to integrate 3rd party productivity applications like Dropbox, Box, Slack, Zoom and Google Drive, so that the employees using them can also ingest their usage for productivity calculation. But I believe that the 3rd party applications will not appreciate their business rival sending crawlers deep inside their product ecosystem to glean usage data to generate productivity insights.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cxj+188ELxls

IBM used to have Personal Social Dashboard PSD II which did exactly the same work before it was shut down in 2018, old timers will now about this. It was not indexing emails but indexed w3-Connections.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ywd+188ELxls

"If you can't measure, you can't manage"... true today as it ever was.

So this is to be expected.

Where people are the "machines" on the "assembly line", one has to expect that the MBAs are going to want to measure and manage them.

The real answer is one that most of us can't implement reasonably... go back in time and invest the same energy in becoming Doctors, Lawyers or MBAs, that we did in becoming technologists.

  1. e. to have chosen a path to the top side of the class gap, to be on the side deciding, rather than decided on...

"If I new then what I know now", as they say...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xha+188ELxls

This is already being done

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @izn+188ELxls

Swell. Just as we're hearing that we may be moving to Outlook once Lotus Notes is sunset.

And more details in this article on exactly some of the metrics it tracks:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/11/25/microsofts-new-productivity-score-lets-your-boss-monitor-how-often-you-use-email-and-attend-video-meetings/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rap+188ELxls

Post a reply

: