Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Will there be a proportional reduction in management, commensurate with the 1,900 worker-bees that would be cut?

1,900 employees is the typical organization strength headed by a President.

A President may have 4-VPs.

Each VP may have 4-Divisional Managers - total 16.

Each Divisional Manager may have 4-Department Heads - total 64.

The 1,900 employees that would be gone soon belong to different organizations, and not to a single one. So, it’s not as though the management won’t have people to supervise.

But it still begs the question - if 1,900 employees are being let go, will 64-Department heads, 16-Divisional managers, 4-VPs and 1-President be let go?

by
| 4156 views | | 20 replies (last November 6, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17L7i8nI

20 replies (most recent on top)

Depends on how many executives and managers are under the age of 52..... because ages 52 & up are a protected class. In typical Exxon fashion, Mgmt published a "one size fits all" program that does not address the re-org that will have to accompany these layoffs. So 20-30 year employees, who have worked to get into new leadership positions will take the fall for the existing leadership class with 30+ years experience who brought us to this fiasco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rck+17L7i8nI

My manager went for a non-managerial position just a few days ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1val+17L7i8nI

There will be executives let go.

The question will be how many CL 28 and CL 29 Managers will be selected given that managers comprise the top half of every CL 28-29 rank list in the company and individual contributors comprise the bottom half of the list?

Will CL 28-29 Managers escape the cuts due to their privileged ranking position or will they and their bloated salaries be fairly included in the selections?

Objectively, a smaller organization doesn’t need nearly as many middle managers. We’ll see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bhw+17L7i8nI

The July pips included management. I personally know of several that were told to retire. Including executive level.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ywt+17L7i8nI

The problem is not the top nor middle management.. it’s the workers! PIP 50% of the employees population out and we will be 500% better! Not tough!

More layoff is required now that Biden wins.. why.. because we have Darren Woods as our CEO! Got to get him out already!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1edk+17L7i8nI

The mid level managers that do not need the money will retire, I have heard many retired in first go round. Most of those not at retirement will be offered non-management jobs or let go, it will be ugly for them also.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qrr+17L7i8nI

The only organization that is “saving” a President is exploration (UBD) by having the UIS one do both. So maybe, geoscience in UBD will be disproportionately affected by cuts and rolled into one “flatter”, merged organization.
Paper pushers, time sheet controllers, and those who hold the line will not be terminated; instead they will be moved around to continue do damage now on the technical side.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axm+17L7i8nI

The cabal protects its own!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rqq+17L7i8nI

During the PIP exercise, it appeared that supervisors and managers were well protected. Only PIPs in my department were worker bees.
I wouldn’t be surprised if that happens with the layoffs as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1frw+17L7i8nI

Exxon needs cash flow so cutting a few young or lower CL employees isn’t going to do that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ztq+17L7i8nI

Nope. There will be management position eliminated and then those managers will be moved into slots occupied by axed worker bees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1emf+17L7i8nI

@1kbc+17L7i8nI

Only F&L at sites. The whole gambit is in play at spring. It's going to be a shakeup there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zxu+17L7i8nI

@1kbc+17L7i8nI

Not sure what it takes for them to say that with a straight-face and with no compunction!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axe+17L7i8nI

In fuels and lubes a manager mentioned it was only going to be CL 20-26 folks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kbc+17L7i8nI

Actually, in the first round, where people got PIPed ignominiously, it was mentioned that 1,600 people got the NSI-label.

Now it is 1,900. Total is 3,500 (though some may have passed the PIP).

If a Divisional manager typically has 100-employees, then, 35 Divisional managers must be axed.

But we will hear of no one getting cut - the ecosystem is so corrupt that it punishes only the worker-bees.

I would, for sure, would like to see VPs, Divisional managers, Department Heads Nd Group-heads getting axed - just to give them the taste of their own medicine!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aaw+17L7i8nI

It should be proportional so employees will feel like leaders are doing the right thing but will it be? We shall see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxn+17L7i8nI

As some will say: Lock them up, lock them up, lock them up,.....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ash+17L7i8nI

All the maths are good.
Clearly - now that it's conceded EM is a Commodity company, up to 50% of the rumored 'Management' Class can be let go.
Talking entire mid-level classes.
You need the Massa, the Overseer and the Whippers.
That's about it in the Commodity biz.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mkm+17L7i8nI

Dude. It clearly states management is apart of these 1900 cuts. Even executives are fair game.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rxo+17L7i8nI

No.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @his+17L7i8nI

Post a reply

: