Glad they got the net retained cat exposure under control; lol BOOM here is the pandemic for you guys to eat up!!!
7 replies (most recent on top)
We also paid $40m for Mckinsey to tell us how to RIF.. wow wow Now they are go e, but we paying more for Accenture lol
Yes, and they are dissolving that company that AIG paid 40 million for
Do not forget, we (AIG) paid $40 million to free BD from a noncompete agreement with Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd......so we could get what?
Wow....just.....wow!
To Post ID: @itk+16hhmLIv the board is just as responsible for PZ and BD''s actions. They must be gaining something we don't know about. PH did a much better job then the clowns in there now. For them it's a win win. If they leave they get an outrageous package and if they stay they continue to get richer and sink the ship. Greed is their game.
The company would have been better off with Peter H, can you believe that? The stock would have at least stayed i. The 60’s vs losing half its value.
Shareholders and analysts are finally realizing that BD and PZ are not leaders and are just s—ing company dry for their own gain. Stock is down over 6% while market is up.....
Should AIG really be able to report a combined ratio minus CAT exposure when your CAT exposure totaled $674 million dollars in one quarter? AIG is one of the most exposed insurance companies when it comes to CATs so it seems a bit disingenuous to me.