Half of the comments from the company (especially the ones toward the end, but also the one about ‘your story focuses’) make zero sense based on what’s actually in the article. It looks like the Exxon PR people managed to convince the Wall Street Journal to delete the essence of the story. Bad call, editor. It’s not slander. It’s real.
11 replies (most recent on top)
Make sure you oust all your Supervisors and low level managers for all their wrongdoings in an email to HR, EM Bosses, Board Members.. more the merrier. Just say it is for EM corporation benefit.
- g. If you have a supervisor who fudged data or encouraged others to fudge data, lied to management, wrongfully took credit of others work .... just write an elaborate story and share with many high level bosses and HR before you leave the company.
Having worked with “public and government relations,” this does not surprise me hard. Some of the hardest working people in the company are the ones who sweep dirt under the rug! I don’t mean that as a complement.
Here is the real question.. Why does the world not care about the employees that were let go via PIP? Likely has to do with the vast majority of other companies across the US that ALSO use this program to remove employees.
Amazon, Tesla, etc are all also known to do exactly the same, Amazon right now is PIP'ing 10% also this year. It's so common that the majority just don't care that you were a high performer one year and kicked out the next.
“ExxonMobil is a world leader in carbon capture,” is as true as the algae project is a technological success.
How long can they keep lying?
Shouldn’t be too hard to verify the facts, or at least demand proof.
WSJ fail!
That guy interviewed 20 people, and he couldn’t tell more than one story. Really!?
And he left 8 full paragraphs to the exxon PR - unchallenged. It read so like one of those bombastic press releases.
“We are on target to meet or exceed expectations” - Really?! Where, the ramp-up in Permian is an illusion.
What a sad way to cave.
Sorry to all 20 of you that spent time with that reporter.
Benji had more cajones.
So, oto...your comment begs the question: why are you reading a site about nothing?
There is no story at the end of this because there was no story to begin with.
There is also the option if a different paper. WSJ is owed by the same folks as FauxNews
I guess the only thing left to do is tell the world the truth on Glassdoor (what a depressing statement, no offense to Glassdoor). The unethical powerful corporation won; the people lost.
How they let the two quotes below get published is beyond me. Both are total PR b—s—.
“We do not have a target to reduce headcount through our talent management process.”
“ExxonMobil is a world leader in carbon capture,”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/exxon-used-to-be-americas-most-valuable-company-what-happened-oil-gas-11600037243