Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Slow Fall

As an ex employee who served long at Intel, Intel has become a depreciating asset for most rank and file employees who worked hard to build the company. During the 90s, everyone wanted to work at Intel. Yes, the meteoric stock rise was boosting the morale, but that was not the only reason. People had a closer connection with their managers, people were high on the prospect of building the world's chips and everyone wanted to come to office impulsively. That morale, energy and camaraderie is no longer there. If any one looks at the parking lots these days, eveyone clocks in at 9am and clocks out before 5pm. Managers have transformed into task masters and slave drivers, with nothing to offer by way of a career rise no role modeling - for people who are locked into a technology company that has no parallel in the US, or perhaps anywhere in the world. I have not met any one IC who does not complain about one's manager at Intel.

The upper management, OTOH, kept on rewarding itself with promotions and some 50 new VP appointments every year - in good times, average times and bad times - some of whom hardly manage organizations smaller than 20 people. Notice anytime the company earns better profit than expected, there will be a slew of VP promotions for those in the upper echelons, while the rank and file are given an average 1.5% raise. The company that once used to pride in meritocracy now parodies itself as the paragon of "hire for DNA".

Intel is in a slow fall. I will give another 15 years before it will dissolve itself like Motorola did - under very similar corporate philosophical directions. Everything else matters over trust, merit and work. Perhaps Intel, like other old guard companies, will have a big role to play in the world economy. It will continue to churn chips on a global scale. But, only as shadow of its former self before 2005.

by
| 3671 views | | 11 replies (last August 12, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+169feaig

11 replies (most recent on top)

Consulting companies like Bain are tools for weak executives who wants to do certain things but lack the courage. They would make their wishes known to Bain and Bain would echo back to him as to who to shoot next. So, yes, it is a symptom. Grove would not need them. They are for p—ies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gycl+169feaig

@eqcj+169feaig How could Bain know the complexity and deep rooted culture of lying within the company. Of the senior executives couldn’t be honest among the senior leaders and BoD you think a bunch of consultants can figure out the poison and the fix?

Take PTD they didn’t tell the truth to their design partners nor senior leaders, you think they would tell a bunch of Bain monkeys?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fihq+169feaig

"Bain was the downfall of Intel"

No, Bain is a symptom of the downfall that started with cascade of leadership deterioration which began with Barrett, plateaued with with Otellini and cratered with Krszanich. If the leaders had the wisdom and brains, the would not have needed Bain. Bain was an escape hatch for the top leadership when the plane started to crash.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eqcj+169feaig

Bain was the downfall of Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dxsf+169feaig

this is why I left Intel. It was apparent that I would always get small raises, puny RSU's and treated worse than a dog by my manager.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qga+169feaig

"Barrett, Otellini, Krzanich"

If Barrett, Otellini, Krzanich were hacks, I wonder it will make of Swan - a bandaid trying stem a gun wound !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bnt+169feaig

At least the past 3 Intel executives have been hacks without any visionary leadership to speak of: Barrett, Otellini, Krzanich ... all forgettable without any visionary direction for the company. With all that money, Intel could not grow its monopoly into something more substantial, amazing Does Not Meet Expectations for the board and those executives!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dms+169feaig

Spot on, especially about the slave driving managers that give zero f-s for anyone but themselves and will throw you under the bus to save their worthless a-s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jcs+169feaig

Perfectly said: "Managers have transformed into task masters and slave drivers, with nothing to offer by way of a career rise no role modeling". I would not admit to knowing most Intel managers in public or introduce them to my family or friends, they don't need that scum invading their lives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fdf+169feaig

I agree on that there must be a US based company that owns design and manufacturing of processors and other chips.
It’s unfortunate that People who never had experience of leading a fab company was given opportunity with fabless background.

At any cost Intel must not fabricate from TSMC. They should focus on getting back on track.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fhf+169feaig

Absolutely no fix? America needs a company like Intel, if not Intel. We need to own microprocessor design and manufacture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1may+169feaig

Post a reply

: