Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM is not run for the benefit of shareholders

This is widely believed, but not quite true. The massive amounts of spending on stock buybacks - money that was desperately need if the Cloud business was to have any chance of keeping pace - barely keeps the stock price stable. Existing shareholders are treading water.

The real beneficiaries of propping up the stock price are options holders. Without the buybacks, existing options would be underwater, and new options would have little attraction.

So the question one should be asking is: who has lots of options?

by
| 1624 views | | 3 replies (last May 28, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15bzuCwq

3 replies (most recent on top)

End of H1B only makes offshoring even worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jqt+15bzuCwq

If her situation is anything like nearly every other executive of a major public corporation, Ginni cannot just sell large quantities of stock on a whim. She has to file a plan with the SEC setting out her intentions well in advance. It's one of the things that supposed to protect against insider trading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @efb+15bzuCwq

I'll bite. Who has lots of options?

Not the executives, save Rometty. But hers were premium priced from $126 to $155 or some such. She should have exercised everything she could when the stock popped when she announced her retirement. Even then, it wouldn't have netted her nearly as much as the rest of her package.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eav+15bzuCwq

Post a reply

: