Hey, not sure who all reads stuff here. Seems like a huge number of super unhappy people go back and forth. I want to start a discussion that may help management and potential future employees that come after us in case one might ever stumble on this here info later.
Background: In my career, I have had long term gigs - longer than 10 years each time except for work in college and masters program. Always left on my own terms. One of those was aerospace, one was high tech consumer products. The high tech consumer product place laid off fairly regularly because they'd come out with a product, the Chinese would make a cheap knock off, demand and profit would go down. They cut and went in different directions. If you couldn't adapt you weren't useful. The previous aerospace place was remarkably stable (sorry I was recruited away given recent developments).
Then I come to GAC, and in my time here which ended today, there have been 3 really deep painful cuts and lots of little house cleanings. Didn't know everyone that was cut over the years obviously, but it seemed to be a mix of excellent guys and a few more average joes, but not many slugs that i can recall.
If GAC has solid recruiting, effective hiring, is run well, makes a good product that is in demand, why do they have to hack so deep, so often? I guess someone might make the argument that Savannah is so small and isolated from the rest of the country it is hard to hire good talent for the aerospace industry. So they stick a warm body in, and dump them later. But I know that many of us like me cost GAC upwards of $70,000 just to relocate here, not including signing incentives. I can only recall one guy in more than a decade who probably deserved to go in my department.
If I operate under the assumption I worked hard over my years here (I did), was technically expert (I am), had enough work to keep me very busy (I did), was loyal (I was), why couldn't GAC find a way to keep me? What can they do better to not be in the position to spend so much cash hiring and firing, ruining lives, and just recruit and keep highly qualified stable workforce that only needs a quick trim every so often?
What would you tell people who might consider GAC as an employer in the future?