Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM Doubles Down on Cloud Bet With New Leadership Team

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibm-doubles-down-on-cloud-bet-with-new-leadership-team-11580476421

In his 30 years at International Business Machines Corp., IBM +4.80% incoming Chief Executive Arvind Krishna has witnessed what works in corporate turnarounds and, more recently, what doesn’t.

Mr. Krishna, 57 years old, is only the 10th chief executive in IBM’s 108-year history. He takes over a company that has been in transition for almost the entirety of his predecessor Ginni Rometty’s eight-year run in the job.

The problems are clear. IBM sales have fallen around 25% in the past eight years, as other tech companies’ top lines have soared. In the hottest field in business technology today, cloud computing—where companies rent rather than buy computing horsepower—IBM trails leaders Amazon.com Inc. and Microsoft Corp. by a wide margin.

Catching such strong rivals “is going to be a challenge,” said David Bahnsen, chief investment officer of the Newport Beach, Calif.-based Bahnsen Group, which has more than $2.25 billion of assets under management and is a holder of IBM stock. He welcomed Mr. Krishna’s appointment, saying he had a good chance of using the company’s strong cash flow to deliver growth in new areas.

Shares of IBM rose 4% in midday trading Friday to $142.42, despite the selloff occurring in the broader market.

Mr. Krishna, who will formally become CEO on April 6, joined IBM in 1990, the year before the company posted—what was then—the largest annual loss in American corporate history. The economy was tanking, and businesses were shifting from IBM mainframes to personal computers.

To turn things around, IBM hired Lou Gerstner from RJR Nabisco Inc. as chief executive—the first outsider to lead the company. He remade IBM into an IT services giant that catered to the embrace of computing in the office.

Mr. Krishna inherits a far healthier bottom line from Ms. Rometty than Mr. Gerstner was bequeathed. Sustainable top-line growth, though, remains a challenge.

The appointment of Mr. Krishna, who heads the company’s cloud and cognitive-software division, recalls Microsoft’s elevation of its cloud chief, Satya Nadella, to run the company in 2014. The bet on the cloud helped drive growth at Microsoft, propelling it to a value of more than $1.3 trillion, 10 times that of IBM.

IBM also named Jim Whitehurst —the chief executive of Red Hat, the open-source software giant that IBM acquired for approximately $33 billion last year—as its president, the first time it has given an executive that singular title. The Red Hat deal was Ms. Rometty’s signature move to accelerate IBM’s growth in the cloud.

But the competition there is stiff. Alphabet Inc.’s Google has bolstered its cloud team to try to catch Amazon and Microsoft. Oracle Corp., like IBM a legacy tech company hunting growth by refocusing on that segment, last year announced it was adding to its cloud-computing workforce.

Messrs. Krishna and Whitehurst also face challenges similar to those Ms. Rometty inherited in 2012: reinvigorating a 350,000-person workforce and dealing with units that aren’t making as much money as they used to and face poor growth prospects.

IBM’s IT-outsourcing business, once an earnings driver, is now ripe for paring back, analysts have said. Jim Kavanaugh, the company’s chief financial officer, this month said the Global Technology Services unit was poised for “aggressive structural actions to reposition the business,” without specifying the actions.

“One thing they need to do is come up with a more aggressive plan to exit those businesses or find a home for them so they can focus on the businesses that are the future of IBM,” said David Grossman, analyst at Stifel Financial.

Ray Wang, the founder of the Silicon Valley-based advisory firm Constellation Research Inc., said the newly anointed CEO showed his ability to fix problems when he refocused the then-struggling Watson business. Under Mr. Krishna, IBM turned the collection of artificial-intelligence and analytics technologies to practical business problems instead of grander, hard-to-achieve goals it initially set for itself, Mr. Wang said.

Mr. Krishna, who studied at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, and received an electrical engineering doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, comes with a technology background that could help IBM as the tech sector undergoes further change. He oversees a company that still ranks among the top producers of patents and has co-authored 15 himself.

Mr. Krishna has been closely involved in steering the company’s future technology work in areas such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing. IBM has bet heavily that those fields betting will drive future corporate IT spending.

IBM isn’t alone in that bet, though. Google, Microsoft and Amazon also are wagering heavily on AI and quantum.

by
| 1327 views | | 9 replies (last February 8, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+13h673jx

9 replies (most recent on top)

8tvw. You are pretty much hitting all of the facts. IBM is over managed and under skilled. I suspect a lot of IBM HW and SW managers found cover during layoffs via moving to the IBM legacy cloud. IBM has struggled to make Legacy cloud work, as they are hooked on OTC features. To make matters worse, the overhead of experienced managers who add zero value means everything is over priced, BUT when you are the only game in town, it’s easy to over price if the customer is not willing to switch. Krishna has to address these issues ASAP. I suspect we will see a rather large layoff or spinoff over the next 90 days. Most likely both, as IBM has to get its house in order, and that means streaming the management team, having competitive offerings vs Intel, and encouraging customers to stick with IBM vs switching to the low price offerings. Whitehurst saw that from day one, and has pressed it home to IBM. IBM agreed in that they have split the job of CEO/Chairman/President into 3 parts. Krishna will execute the rightsizing of IBM, Whitehurst will execute the strategic vision of IBM moving to cloud and incorporating all things LINUX, and Ginni (mostly figurehead) will oversee the board and dissuade their worry’s. It’s going to be an interesting 10 months as the last remaining Legacy employees will have to make a choice, between staying with what they know, or adapting and moving forward. Most will retire, some will get stuffed into the spinoffs and traded away, and finally the non-adaptors will get laid off. Jan of 2021 will have Whitehurst move to CEO and Krishna move to chairman (figurehead). Whitehurst will set the strategy and future for IBM and Krishna and the board will play along and approve it. The plan was set 6 months Ago when Redhat agreed to be taken over.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8zvt+13h673jx

As a customer of IBM zCloud, I will say that until the attitude and competency level of the IBM staff changes IBM will continue to flounder.
Our company management apologized to our employees, saying they had not expected the results we received by outsourcing our mainframe to IBM zCloud. We now will be migrating totally off the mainframe in a two year period.
The attitude of the IBM managers has been one of entitlement and divisiveness. Every minor request turns into a million dollar, year long project which never seems to meet expectations. Every meeting has a cadre of IBM managers and employees, infighting and blaming each other and the customer is routine. There are some good IBM employees, they all seem to be afraid to step up and get in the crosshairs of the chest thumpers. IBM must teach its employees to Sell HotAir. IBM has a staff of 50 to do what our company did with 5 people. Yet they still get little accomplished.

In speaking with others, I do not think our experience is uncommon.
IBM needs an attitude adjustment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8tvw+13h673jx

Over the last year, Most of the major Indian outsourcers are playing a market share game. They are using the old adage we’ll make it up in volume. GTS and IBM in general has some excess market share to give, BUT they will want a pretty price for it, as market share is the name of the game

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vkd+13h673jx

Reckon gts will get sold to HCL profit margins are too small and gts has a tendency to use non IBM software

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nli+13h673jx

Just remember Ginni came from an engineering background too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nxj+13h673jx

if you are not customer facing and only deal with IBM internal side I would polish the resume up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @moy+13h673jx

70 is the new 60, as the saying goes.

I think Ginni is 62. And likely, they would have let her ride two more years had she not messed up the company so badly in the past 8 yrs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @emr+13h673jx

Interesting that Krishna is 57 years old.

IBM normally gives a CEO 10 years or until 60 years old - whichever comes first.

Is the secret plan to give full control to Jim Whitehurst in 2023?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nlz+13h673jx

"said the newly anointed CEO showed his ability to fix problems when he refocused the then-struggling Watson business. " Umm.. I seem to recall he did this in large part due to massive layoffs across that division. I know some people here on this forum were victims of that.

He did the same thing while running "Cloud". At the time, nearly every service in GTS had been rebranded Cloud, and under him, and he decimated that division with layoffs and offshoring, too.

What he does get right is that IBM is over bloated and in need of massive paring down. Y'all better just hope you're not in the sights of his next "fixing".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shd+13h673jx

Post a reply

: