Thread regarding Riverbed Technology Inc. layoffs

Was it real or just an illusion?

Remember the famous line from the movie “The Sixth Sense”.... “ I see dead people”
Riverbed has been dead for several years now, it’s just that people did not realize it was dead. They were deceived in several ways and when the former CEO and founder left, that was the canary in the coal mine.

  1. Do you really think that someone who loved Riverbed as much as he would walk away and see his baby die, unless he knew death was imminent?
  2. Did you look at the company that purchased Riverbed’s history of acquisitions and think this would be different?

When Riverbed was purchased, it was put in a coma and on life support. All the people who work there did not realize the company was dead as PM and the executives held prayer vigils like SKO to keep the illusion alive.

Once TB secures an equity event, the cat will be let out of the bag and the “Sixth Sense” analogy will finally come to fruition.

by
| 3301 views | | 13 replies (last July 26, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1083ZbcN

13 replies (most recent on top)

Agree. Let’s apply to aws and azure. Those who get in first please pull rest of us in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6nie+1083ZbcN

It’s too expensive SDWAN, there are too many major features missing. There are too many bugs and scale issues.

Most companies have tenant space either saas or their own apps in AWS or Azure.

Azure has one of the largest backbones in the world.

Azure networking and AWS will take over this space IMHO and most of the SDWAN vendors will go bust.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6ffq+1083ZbcN

A new GMQ just came out? Any difference from last year?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6vva+1083ZbcN

If the recent Gardner Magic Quad report is to be believed, SD-WAN is going nowhere fast.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6qas+1083ZbcN

Question about B shares. If you hold some, are they tied to any vestment periods?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6noh+1083ZbcN

@1083ZbcN-3jew the post you are linking to is completely made up and factually not true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4bns+1083ZbcN

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTHCkLbVdjgGXywbxVs2PbskA5X4ZBkFVHES5vJSK_khr5dkLP2

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4wxn+1083ZbcN

https://www.thelayoff.com/t/104ch0TD

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jew+1083ZbcN

"They hired him to ... sell the company."

An odd choice as he's a complete unknown and has never been involved in selling a company. How's that working out?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qyl+1083ZbcN

They hired him to do just one job-sell the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ymc+1083ZbcN

TB didn't want to pay 'real CEO' money and equity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3plp+1083ZbcN

Of course he was forced out. The question is why didn't TB replace him with a real CEO?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ttp+1083ZbcN

I suspect he was forced out when it was clear we had no chance for a Re-IPO. In order to re-IPO we needed to show strong growth potential in a new market like SDWAN.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rdh+1083ZbcN

Post a reply

: