Thread regarding General Electric Co. layoffs

GE’s Larry Culp Faces Ultimate CEO Test in Trying to Save a Once-Great Company

One Sunday in March, Gary Wiesner, who runs General Electric Co.’s wind-turbine-blade factory in Pensacola, Fla., received something he’d never gotten before: a personal email from the CEO. H. Lawrence Culp Jr. wanted to know if it would be OK if he came for a visit.

When Culp arrived two days later, alone, in jeans, it marked the first time a GE chief executive officer had visited the plant since the company bought it 18 years ago. He spent about two hours walking the floor and chatting with technicians, stopping only briefly for a call with the board of directors.

A longtime devotee of Toyota-style lean manufacturing, Culp was in his element. While overhead screens flashed measurements of the production pace in eight-hour increments, Culp wondered aloud if the metrics were visual enough and whether they could be broken down into 20-minute or even 10-minute slices, so workers would know sooner when they might be falling behind on their goals. At the tour’s end, he urged them to face up to production issues as early in the process as possible—or, as he put it, “Let’s make it red, make it ugly, let’s go fix them,” Wiesner recalls. A half-hour after leaving, Culp sent another email promising to return.

The wind turbine business is among the least of Culp’s worries. GE’s balance sheet is lopsided with debt, its GE Power division is shedding millions of dollars in cash daily, the stock price is barely in double digits, and the Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company’s accounting practices. Nonetheless, Culp’s Pensacola visit is a telling example of how the first outsider to run GE is trying to fix it, metric by metric.

(SIDE NOTE:-) More Layoffs to come white and blue collar, and plant closings!

Since taking over as CEO on Oct. 1, he’s eschewed the company’s Boston headquarters for frequent travel, spending day-and-a-half sessions with GE units around the world and meeting with CEOs at Boeing, Duke Energy, and Safran, among other customers. In May, the night before his appointment to see FedEx Corp. CEO Fred Smith, he flew to Memphis to watch a million-odd packages handled in the “night sort” at the company’s main shipping hub. Culp ordered almost 50 GE business heads to take off June 10-14 for an on-the-factory-floor, “true-lean” manufacturing boot camp that he’s helping to teach.

None of this would surprise people who worked with Culp in his 14 years as CEO at Danaher Corp., the low-profile industrial conglomerate. On his watch, Danaher grew fivefold in revenue while Culp, in the mold of GE legend Jack Welch, oversaw scores of acquisitions. And like Welch, Culp isn’t the sort to buy a company and forget it. It wasn’t unusual to see Culp moving equipment around in factories or strolling trade shows seeking time with customers. While studying an orthodontics company Danaher had bought, Culp decided he could best understand its customers by testing the product himself. “Probably he didn’t need braces, but he got braces,” says Vicente Reynal, who ran that business for Culp.

Culp retired from Danaher four years ago at the age of 51. The behemoth he’s charged with rescuing is, with $120 billion in annual revenue, six times the size of that company, with quadruple the number of employees. GE Power, which produces electricity-generating equipment, is by itself larger than Danaher. Whereas Culp expanded his former company with acquisitions, his first job at GE will be to shrink it. At Danaher he could mostly ignore an outside world that mostly ignored him—a luxury he no longer enjoys.

Culp is an “inspired choice,” but the skills he honed at Danaher—buying companies and making them more efficient—don’t prepare him for the mess at GE, concluded research firm Paragon Intel in a recent report. JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Stephen Tusa, who predicted GE’s collapse before his peers, has argued that there still hasn’t been a true accounting of the extent of the company’s problems.

Culp’s many acolytes aren’t fazed. Jim Lico, who worked for him at Danaher and now runs Fortive Corp., a Danaher spinoff, says that when he heard of his old boss’s new job, he bought a “meaningful” chunk of GE stock. “And I think most of the people that have worked for him did, too,” Lico says. “When you look at how Danaher changed over the course of his CEO tenure, there might not have been as many zeros behind the numbers, but the work he did to build Danaher was every bit as risky” as what he confronts at GE.

Culp himself doesn’t seem terribly worried, either. “Is it more challenging? I can’t say that it is,” he said in a brief phone interview in January, sounding supremely confident, or deeply delusional, or possibly both. “I wish I had more hours in the day, I wish we had started sooner, but I can’t deal with any of that. We’re just trying to make progress a little bit every day.”

The magnitude of GE’s fall probably helps Culp by giving him a longer leash with investors than his predecessors. Wall Street was always skeptical of Welch’s successor, Jeffrey Immelt, who overpaid for some early acquisitions and later committed the cardinal sin of cutting the dividend. Then John Flannery was too busy dousing fires during his short reign to build rapport with shareholders. Culp brought his gleaming Danaher résumé and zero GE baggage. Although it’s not at all clear that he can return GE to its past glory, he probably can’t make things much worse.

Good read but there is no saving GE Power! Those who stay in GE Power are very foolish and are very unskillful. Any educated or uneducated worker can see what is about to happen. No union or Government can stop this from happening. Plant closings and more Layoffs on a higher scale.

by
| 3948 views | | 16 replies (last June 14, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+ZwzWj3e

16 replies (most recent on top)

We're going one piece flow so that at least some of us will have jobs in 2025.

Also saw in Larry's notes about this week's lean event that some of the Greenville folks were willing to raise well-intentioned objections, and Larry listened to their point of view and didn't diminish them for having one.

I for one am optimistic. This guy is a good middle ground between Jack and Jeff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2uet+ZwzWj3e

Don't worry about lean practices causing layoffs. GE is so slow implementing anything it will be years. The layoffs will come but not as a result of lean. Power has known problems that can be turned around over time. Unfortunately many of us won't be around to see it. What scares me is Aviation. Things have been pretty good but they should be concentrating on costs and process. Instead they are hiring tons of overhead/corporate type employees and spending to much on culture, travel and assorted fluff. Get serious while things are going good so a downturn will not crush us like Power.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ctt+ZwzWj3e

@1ueo-

They are doing one piece flow because when they cut heads they can still do production to keep the place open without shutting it down. To save themselves million in clean up. But eventually it will shut down like Fort Edward NY did.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lor+ZwzWj3e

The problems I have seen with "one piece flow" is when one piece in the flow process is missing ( machine breakdown, worker absent, consumable shortage, etc.) The whole process is shutdown. The theory looks good on paper, but not too effective for reliable,mass production of parts.

As for teaming, I have seen employees (the people who know their job best) hold back effective ideas because, let's face it, who wants to make more work for themselves through "lean processes" . Lean means less wasted time and higher productivity for the most part. Work smarter AND harder.

I am not suggesting we throw the baby out with the bathwater, but lean and the teams who support the process must be careful and intelligent on the implications of it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ueo+ZwzWj3e

Culp needs to manage to numbers. Cold hard numbers. That would be a change. He doesn't know what numbers to manage to because his managers A) can't figure it out B) wouldn't tell him if if they knew. They'd prefer to sandbag their targets knowing they can exceed them before the end of the year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1osx+ZwzWj3e

@1yvo -- GE never implemented Lean in the manner of Toyota or Danaher. Toyota Lean practices include much more than single-piece-flow, where GE always focused. Lean practices include respecting people and empowering teams to communicate and make effective decisions to improve processes and products. Internally, Danaher's first motto is "The Best Team Wins". That's in stark contrast to GE's top-down hierarchy and focus on the individual as hero.

Note the title of this week's session for GE leaders that Culp is helping to teach: it's called "True Lean". All of this makes me cautiously optimistic Culp has a chance to bring about some of the "culture change" we badly need.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fry+ZwzWj3e

I have seen to many fake lean projects to be impressed with the term. I do know that a central command approach to running a very large business will not work in the long term. Personally I think the jury is still out on this guy. I didn't like the reaction he had when one of his suppliers opted out of the lean workout in Greenville. The suppliers should not be discouraged or threatened when they exercise independent judgment. It's enough to terminate them for poor results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wtd+ZwzWj3e

What else is there to “save?”

The entire company needs to be saved — from its legacy culture.

If not, nothing will be left to save in the end.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hpc+ZwzWj3e

Save what? What's left? The fire sale is over. Power will take a few years at best to recover from poor to mediocre sales. Aviation is selling engines out the yazoo right now and will be for at least the next decade. God help us if that sets screwed up. Nothing to save there, only maintain and grow. So what else is there to "save"?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzk+ZwzWj3e

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-06-12/ge-s-larry-culp-faces-ultimate-ceo-test-in-trying-to-save-a-once-great-company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1emb+ZwzWj3e

The former CEO’s imperious super-ego manifested itself overbearingly. It was the ultimate root cause of the demise of this storied company.

Leadership matters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zav+ZwzWj3e

GE is a flawed company foundationally; and Larry Culp can't walk on water.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lcy+ZwzWj3e

GE is a flawed company foundationally; and Larry Culp can't walk on water.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xmm+ZwzWj3e

Culp may be the right person but it will take substantially more than one to right the ship. Lean and value stream processing mapping exercises were done at (most) Industrial businesses in the late 90s and early 00s. Things were followed up, there was rigor and changes were made. The problem is over time leadership diverted its attention to other things and forgot to maintain the core. Will that happen again? Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, for him to be successful he still needs to clear out many of the legacy EB and higher ranks. If nothing else than to get rid of the tarnished image and failed company that that they lead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yvo+ZwzWj3e

@ZwzWj3e-rln..... I think I-melt lost his head as soon as he was promoted to CEO , then his ego took over and it was all downhill from there. The new CEO probably knows more about the businesses in 8 months than I-melt knew in his 30+ years with the company. So far, he looks willing to get his hands dirty. Hopefully he’s the right person for the job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hgq+ZwzWj3e

Culp has his head screwed on, immelt lost his sometime between 2001 and 2008 after that it was all down hill till Culp picked up the ball and started running.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rln+ZwzWj3e

Post a reply

: