Thread regarding General Electric Co. layoffs

GE Power H-Frame Failure Causes $10 Stock Target

GE Shares Slide as JPMorgan Lowers Price Target on Gas Turbine Concerns

Martin Baccardax

Updated Sep 20, 2018 6:37 AM EDT

General Electric (GE) shares slipped lower in pre-market trading Thursday after JPMorgan analysts cut their rating on the struggling conglomerate amid concerns that a key gas turbine launch would hit the group's earnings.

Lead analyst Stephen Tusa, who has a underweight rating on the stock, lowered this price target to $10 a share from $11 as he reiterated concerns for the company's power division. Tusa said that checks on two initial U.S. installations revealed failures of the first stage blade of GE's H-frame gas turbine, and lowered his 2019 EPS to $0.75 cents a shares from $0.80 cents a share (against a Street consensus $1.04) and to $0.82 from $0.92 cents a share in 2020.

"The impact on 'asset value" from a failure at GE's U.S. H-frame launch customer, which tough to estimate, represents a negative development for a company that has little wiggle room for more "shoes to drop", counting on V-shape recoveries in long cycle businesses to reduce leverage that is already well above levels that support the standing rating," Tusa wrote.

"While the debate can rage around the structural versus cyclical nature of the power industry downturn is as bad as it seems, we believe there should be no longer any doubt that GE Power has company-specific issues," Tusa added "Not only due to the decline in the profit pool from tis large installed base of services, but now around the H-fram technology."

GE shares fell 2.02% from their Wednesday close in pre-market trading, indicating an opening bell price of $12.60 each, a move that would extend the stock's year-to-date decline past 28%.

Late last month, analysts at JPMorgan noted that "increased competition and lower demand for turbines and power plants" were creating a "prisoner's dilemma" for GE, where the company either "walks from business, turning up the heat on the melting ice cube, or cuts price to maintain the installed base, slowing the speed of the secular decline, while they figure out a strategy forward."

Credit rating giant Moody's has been monitoring GE's struggling power division for several months, noting in late April that GE's rating could be downgraded if "Moody's expects that revenues in the Power segment will be subject to further declines beyond 2019."

"The market continues to be difficult with softness in orders putting pressure on our cash flow and working capital," CEO John Flannery told investors on July 20. "The team continues to focus on rightsizing footprint, reducing base cost, improving quality, and maximizing value of our installed base. This transformation is taking place in the context of a very dynamic macro environment."

GE, which was turfed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average ^DJI by S&P Dow Jones Indices in favor of Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (WBA) ,has been attempting to streamline its myriad businesses under Flannery's leadership for several months, announcing plans in late June to spin off its healthcare division and sell its stake in oil services group Baker Hughes (BHGE)

GE said the plans, which follow its ongoing strategic review, will mark a shift in focus towards its power, aviation and renewable-energy businesses and create "a simpler, stronger, leading high-tech Industrial company."

https://www.thestreet.com/markets/ge-shares-slide-as-jpmorgan-lowers-price-target-on-gas-turbine-concerns-14717987

by
| 4922 views | | 31 replies (last January 30, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+VfCz4KO

31 replies (most recent on top)

"TS7 will not show you failures after 7000+hours, right?"

Eh, no... sort of. It was designed for a certain life, maybe 48,000 hours or something. By over firing they accelerate whatever life issues there might be and after inspection and data reduction, you can project the life at a standard firing temperature. So either A) they didn't over fire at least not enough or B) their predictive techniques were not good enough or, my guess, C) they ignored the data that they got because they didn't like it.

So now they're hip-deep in reality and have to live with it. If they had a good predictive model then they should have believed it. If they didn't have a good predictive model then they should have done the design process differently. S---s to be wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @28etc+VfCz4KO

@VfCz4KO-6sne when GE had Tranes they were called Weathertrons. The quality was too good for a GE product, so they sold it in 1982 to Trane.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @28ovj+VfCz4KO

TS7 will not show you failures after 7000+hours, right? So you have to go to the customer if you are not sure if your parts will survive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @28gfp+VfCz4KO

"the first HA overfired and then fix it in the field"

Then why have TS7?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mohj+VfCz4KO

I think Russels strategy is still good, selling the first HA overfired and then fix it in the field with the 2nd gen. blade later. Otherwise we'd certainly not have sold that many HA units compared to MHPS or Siemens. So let's see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mhmj+VfCz4KO

"1wre...first of all you spelled trains wrong.....you had TRANES...??"

Same guy. Over and over. Mocking his made up misspellings. Pretend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6nro+VfCz4KO

the general has many things up his sleave dont be confyoused all of this is just a trick to make the stock price $10 and then the big dogs will bye lots of stock and then they will relese news of some big sales and then the stock will zoom up to $20 again and JF will ride again

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6xpw+VfCz4KO

So do we know what fix GE is offering its customers? is it just a replacement or something new

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6hcd+VfCz4KO

1wre...first of all you spelled trains wrong.....you had TRANES...??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6sne+VfCz4KO

“To be effective you must not let your need to be right be more important than your need to find out what’s true. If you are too proud of what you know or of how good you are at something you will learn less, make inferior decisions, and fall short of your potential.”

― Ray Dalio, Principles: Life and Work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gkh+VfCz4KO

Yes, they can. But according to the news, they haven't. From what I've seen, JPM simply heard "oxidation issue", and reduced the lowest prediction among analysts from $11 to $10.

I agree that they "could" talk to end users, just as easily as I could. But the 9FB has been in the field for enough years (I could Google it, but I assume you would deny that number anyway) that JPM had plenty of years to break the story... They didn't.

P.S. - if you know if an undergrad program that teaches how to predict a turbine blade temperature so precisely that the oxidation life is obvious, based on back of the envelope math, please specify the university.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ggo+VfCz4KO

It’s true that the analysts probably don’t know much about the specifics of GT design (although more analysts than you think were engineering undergrads who later got a top tier MBA).

Anyway, that aside, they don’t need to have much technical knowledge. Firms like JPM can easily do channel checks. They can talk directly to HA class operators (these are known, GE even publicizes them when possible). These guys will divulge info; perhaps not the CEO, but certainly some other folks will. Next, they can check with owners of other GT platforms, to determine which units outside of HA are affected. Next, they can check with the suppliers of the parts that are affected, and again, it is easy to figure out who those are.

By this point they know which parts are affected, how many are affected, and the cost of the remedy on an order of magnitude basis. Based simply on back of the envelope math, they know whether it will cost GE $1M, $10M, $100M, or $1B. And that is sufficient to make a trade recommendation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ays+VfCz4KO

Sheesh. These turbines are getting to be as bad as the GE appliances in terms of poor quality and early failure. Better sell it off soon!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2emu+VfCz4KO

I love a good technical debate as much as he next engineer, if not more. But I’d be amazed if any of the financial analysts at J.P. Morgan knew about any of this, much less understand it. They just can’t seem to resist taking another huge swipe at their favorite target, given the tiniest reason.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hlt+VfCz4KO

...this is a boon for Power Services....

No no no

These units will be mothballed. No one wants to run a GT anymore. That thinking is so 2014.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hvw+VfCz4KO

Many of those FBs will be beyond the warranty period, so in a way this is a boon for Power Services.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2chx+VfCz4KO

...only 75 9FB has been sold...

If they are breaking then they will never be fixed. The 9FB was the bellwether for today's market where initial sales disappoint, the starts and hours are lower than they expect and many units are put up before their time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bza+VfCz4KO

could we be so lucky for russell to leave on his own? any guesses on the size of his parachute? my guess is $9M

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2uod+VfCz4KO

Good thing only 75 9FB has been sold this past 15 years...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ge-power/general-electric-says-blade-problem-affects-more-gas-turbines-idUSKCN1M12HG

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wox+VfCz4KO

@1pea, the financial guys have ruined many companies. Especially GE. The only thing they can manufacture is financial jargon. Their balance sheets are comic books. GE made money when engineers made decisions. The bean counters have destroyed our desire to care. Keep counting beans until the balance sheet had no more beans to count. Save a few beans to eat. We are going to need them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ahe+VfCz4KO

Russell has a plan? He is a financial guy who doesn't know one end of a turbine from the other.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pea+VfCz4KO

Russell’s only plan is an exit-plan

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zov+VfCz4KO

Time for bankruptcy discussions

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tmz+VfCz4KO

it seems allot off people hear think they are experts well let me just say that ge still has the worlds greatest and they will fix all these problems because they have lots of experence in airplanes and tranes and turbines. Russel has a plan!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wre+VfCz4KO

You don't have to be faster than the bear just faster than the guy next to you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lnj+VfCz4KO

Haha, GE doesn't even have a cohesive team. 6B engineers fighting with the HA engineers? No wonder you can't design anything that works.

This is fun to watch from a safe distance. I'm glad I got laid off last year and now have a real job with a real company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hjg+VfCz4KO

To the one that said "As it stands, I'm on this sinking ship with the rest of you fools, praying for a miracle and looking for a new job."

Reach out on linked in … sure they would love to have you join the team ...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1feb+VfCz4KO

"no longer any doubt that GE Power has company-specific issues"

Ya think?

Looking down from the top and from the outside in, all they can see are halos.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pzc+VfCz4KO

"[W]e believe there should be no longer any doubt that GE Power has company-specific issues," Tusa added.

A Google search of "turbine blade oxidation" showed "about 1,930,000 results". That's hardly a company-specific issue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mpi+VfCz4KO

"General Electric Co said on Thursday that four of its new flagship power turbines in the United States have been shut down due to an “oxidation issue” and warned it expects the problem to affect more of the 51 units it has shipped, sending shares lower."

"GE could be forced to pay millions of dollars in compensation to customers and make costly design changes if the problems persist, industry experts said."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mgg+VfCz4KO

that is funny sheet

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ava+VfCz4KO

Post a reply

: