Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Apple behind on payments to us, about 7B

Oh, my...

(Reuters) - Qualcomm Inc said in a court hearing on Friday that Apple Inc is $7 billion (£5.5 billion) behind in patent royalty payments to the mobile chip firm, which for years supplied parts for the iPhone. Apple and Qualcomm are involved in a series legal actions. Apple has accused Qualcomm of unfair patent licensing practices. Qualcomm, the world’s largest mobile phone chip supplier, has in turn accused Apple of patent infringement.

Qualcomm made its comments about the size of Apple’s unpaid royalties in a hearing in one of the cases in federal court in San Diego. Apple has disputed the amount of royalties that it owes to Qualcomm. Apple has argued that Qualcomm is forcing it to pay for the same patents twice, once when Apple uses Qualcomm’s chip in iPhones and then again through patent royalties. Qualcomm has argued that its practices are legal and that Apple is seeking to destroy Qualcomm’s business model after agreeing to it for years.

by
| 3512 views | | 13 replies (last October 31, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+VRO3ju6

13 replies (most recent on top)

Why bother with patents if judges/law wont back up your rights. Now that wireless is a defacto of life, everyone ones to use it but dont want to pay for it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ymc+VRO3ju6

Governments around the world sued Qcom for their business practices, but they did not touch the licensing deal. When China fined Qcom, they just asked Qcom to reduce their royalty, not get rid of it.

It was something like 4% of 66% of the price of the phone. China could have asked Qcom to get of the royalty, but they didn't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ymr+VRO3ju6

Entitlement issue. Is qualcomm immature. You need to work your a-- off you claim $7B not steal from employees or have entitlement from your customers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yjz+VRO3ju6

Should pay? Wht when they don't have to pay? Apple seems bent on destroying Qualcomm. Apple has refused offers, requests, to sit down and talk to SM.

I don't pretend to know why, but Apple is bent on destruction of Qualcomm.

To some comments below regarding law. If you were correct, Apple would have to honor prior legally valid contracts. Seems that is factually incorrect, given actions of multiple judges, courts, government.agencies and governments in China, Taiwan, EU, South Korea and.the United States plus others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yzq+VRO3ju6

Major players are going vertical, so stop dreaming they will come back as customers. They buy Q chips to stay in market while their inhouse chip matures. However, if there is a patent and a contract then they should pay.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ooc+VRO3ju6

Apple a bunch of crooks anyways ,poor business practice ..Every time a New phone gets released your current phone stops working or having a bunch of issues ..Shady as hell ..and they admitted to doing that too .I hope Qualcomm comes out ahead .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vop+VRO3ju6

F*+k Qualcomm, glad apple is doing it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ctf+VRO3ju6

even if they settle there is no way Apple will ever buy from Qualcomm again.

Q might get an income bump from back due payments (maybe) and maybe a little interest but thats it.

Q at bet will be a $50B cap value by the end of FY19 if it even makes that target

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bnf+VRO3ju6

Apple stopped paying money only because they felt the contract was wrong. It wasn't based on any law change. There was a ruling against double dipping in patents last year, but Apple pulled out of the contract before that ruling. They just wanted to use their power position to force Qualcomm to pay less. The contract Apple and Qcom drew together was a legal contract. Both can renegotiate, but one party can't just void it after it was signed without legal ramifications.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yde+VRO3ju6

@itq. Laws change, FTC constantly updates and enforces, contracts severed, monopolies identified somtimes after decades, etc. Have you noticed pull outs from NAFTA, nuclear arms treaty, etc etc etc? Google soon can't include chrome and more bundled with android in the EU. Gotta keep up with the times.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kax+VRO3ju6

@tpr Then why did they agree to the deal in the first place? The deal is now what it was when they signed it. Apple was a power player then and it still is now. Apple didn't suddenly get smart lawyers and business men now that realized this was a bad deal for them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @itq+VRO3ju6

APPLE is right 100%. Patent has same technology as in chip. This is like apple charging separately for user manual to use its handset. Will you pay for user manual? If no, then why pay for patents again?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpr+VRO3ju6

Legit — ‘Apple is seeking to destroy Qualcomm’s business model after agreeing to it for years.’

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zpf+VRO3ju6

Post a reply

: