Thread regarding Juniper Networks Inc. layoffs

Management has no incentive to change

Have you ever heard of a corrupt leader (politician, businessman), ask for reform? No. If at all, it would be pretty rare. That is because if they are skimming from the top, or benefiting in some way, it is easy to throw their hands up in the air and say "there is no solution" to any problem, and continue on. Obviously, human nature leads you to believe there is no reason for a change, and you should make it last, as long as you can, as long as it is good for you. In essence, most are programmed to "Milk that cow, till the udder runs dry".

On the flip side, those that have the short end of the stick would like to find solutions and work for things to be better. They cry out for help. Look for some way to make those changes happen. After being frustrated when their cries are unanswered, they become less productive over time and sometimes eventually leave.

Good leaders are able to sniff out these situations and make changes. The best leaders are even proactive. I have thought about this at length. Are leaders who cannot find solutions, part of the problem? They usually, they are. They are incompetent, incapable or immature enough not to get the help they need. The best managers I have worked for are open to ideas, find new solutions and continuously make improvements, open to working with diverse groups of people and most importantly humble. The worst managers I have worked for, all work at Juniper.

by
| 2381 views | | 6 replies (last October 10, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Pz7Fg7D

6 replies (most recent on top)

Fieldglass is a site to enter time sheet for per hour workers. You are not a regular FTE.

Clean up of mis-hirings and circle of friends is so common in many Bay Area tech companies. What can be done? Layoff all managements? EEOC doesn't give a damn about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7oat+Pz7Fg7D

Did you mean glassdoor @Pz7Fg7D-jkl?

CEO gets good reviews, but only ~3/4 of the employees recommend working at Juniper. From what I remember, these were lower than Google, Cisco, Arista, however they must be good enough to attract millennials.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bws+Pz7Fg7D

@Pz7Fg7D-qms, not just engineering, it’s everywhere.

@Pz7Fg7D-oti, agree, but not a chance it will be fixed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jyb+Pz7Fg7D

This is nonsense. As an employee at Juniper (without a chip on my shoulder), I can say that these statements are complete lies. Grow up, if you don't enjoy working at Juniper, if indeed you do work here which I doubt, then move on. Don't spend your time spreading malicious gossip. Don't believe me? Look at a reputable site like fieldglass and you will see approval ratings of management are extremely high. Juniper is leading in its field, far from experiencing a "downfall", that said, I sincerely hope they have a clear out of negative influences such as yourself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jkl+Pz7Fg7D

I can't agree more in regards to the influence of personal connections and other factors on personnel matters. The CxOs, SVPs and VPs operate solely on doing each other favors. Hiring and promotion practices in this way are shocking. Both in and outside their own organizations, there are friends, relatives, friends of friends, friends of relatives, relatives of friends, relatives of relatives etc etc etc that get hired and promoted, over merit and skill-based appointments. How can a company this size get by allowing this kind of labor policies? One would think this is illegal. However, senior leaders get away hiring their own kith and kin all the time at Juniper. This is why incompetence is so prevalent and widespread in management. If there is one lesson to be learned from Juniper's downfall, honest and fair behavior just cannot be substituted. How far will they let Juniper fall before fixing these issues? Will Rami and HR take this opportunity to clean up their act in the next few weeks?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oti+Pz7Fg7D

"Milking the cow" has been going on for a while now. No one here hires or promots a manager because they have good ideas but they do so because they are "loyal" or personally connected. This modus operandi percolates top down in engineering. That's very hard to change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qms+Pz7Fg7D

Post a reply

: