Thread regarding State Farm Insurance layoffs

Jump ship or make other arrangements if you are in Systems

I have refrained from commenting for some time but can't do it any longer. If you are in Systems and you aren't coding - get out! 2 years ago this came up in Executive level discussions. Phase I - let the contractors go. Phase 2 - Every SF employee should be able to absorb the work of 3 contactors. Right! Someone thought that was realistic.

It is about as realistic as that ICP project was! The reality is that you brought in too many contractors, you didn't have a real strategy, you didn't train your employees so they could be utilized and retained after the contractors left and you moved them all to jobs that required far less technical expertise. Your business is struggling to survive with all of the overhead Systems created not to mention you haven't delivered anything to them in years! You have essentially slaughtered your company from the inside out Systems Leadership! If it weren't for those fantastic investments you would have drowned yourselves in Operational costs years ago!

They left the Leaders that absolutely failed, spent $ and delivered nothing in charge..... still supposedly leading! So SF apparently has a huge appetite for failure. Because that is what it was a failure! Any other company would have ditched the vision less leadership or lack thereof long ago.... but not SF.... too many relatives, friends etc.

Corporate leaders - you deserve what you got for those ridiculous decisions to keep those folks. They spent your $ and devalued your employees technical skills in the process of acting like they knew had to develop and implement strategy. They weren't leaders they were people trying to act the part. The person at the top just gets shifted to another role? Insanity... the person responsible for the budget and the people keeps her spot? Ridiculous.... isn't the amount of people and the costs the problem? Hubs? That philosophy didn't work, did it? Sounds like she didn't do her job! But all of the people who were just taking the direction from these people are now or will soon be suffering... that doesn't make a bit of sense! Fire those so called Leaders!

I have worked for a few Fortune 50 companies in IT and I have never, I repeat never have witnessed such completely inept Leadership. Just because you all took some dev class together for 6 weeks 25 years ago and you're still floating around does not make you Leaders or prove you have the aptitude to become Leaders! The qualification for Leadership in SF Systems:

  1. Be inbreed....

  2. Ability to sync your nodding head with the rest of the yes men who don't have the sense to ask questions and challenge these brainless ideas

  3. Maintain 100% focus on your bonus and your retirement even if it costs your company the ability to advance technologically, the ability to provide better service to your customer, doing the right thing for your business partners and costing you customers to more competitive companies with lower operating costs and better technology vision.

  4. Always focus on yourself... that's been the measure of success for Systems Leadership.

5 have worked only at SF and don't have a lick of any applicable experience from any where else

I wish you all the very best wishes and hope the people responsible pull their heads out of their rears and put experienced Leaders in place of these lazy losers quickly to try and help save your jobs. Best wishes...

by
| 3736 views | | 7 replies (last November 4, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+PXIjTXS

7 replies (most recent on top)

We've pretty much always known that State Farm management was incompetent, right? In the old days, that used to be a good thing for the rank and file. We'd shamble into their offices once a month for our "one on zero" meetings, and for the most part they left us alone. Of course it goes without saying that raises and promotions often had little bearing on the actual quality or impact of our work, but they weren't looking over our shoulders and the job came with a lot of freedom.

Of course, right around the time of ICP, the generational idiocy of State Farm leadership finally began to eat the company alive.

It was too good to last.

But it did last, for a long, long, long time.

It was like a fantasy land fueled by Monopoly Money, run by Oompa Loompas whose only skill was singing catchy lyrics to the tune of the executives.

Ooompa, Loompa, Doopity Dee!

We could not function elsewhere, you see!

Ooompa, Loompa, Doopity Day!

We're going to destroy State Farm one fine day!

Well, Willy Wonka has blown up the factory and all the little kids are covered in chocolate now. It's too late, kids. No one's winning this contest.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8aee+PXIjTXS

I have to agree. If you are not a software developer, best to get out now. That seems to be the only skill that is valued. Also if you are not willing to be a total yes man... Bail...

Remember, if you have to step over the dead bodies to get to the koolaid............ don't drink the koolaid.....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1occ+PXIjTXS

They tend to promote the people that cant do the work, but do very well setting in meeting and not rocking the boat, or making any real decisions, because thats just the "State Farm way"... Its like college professors, the ones that can not cut it in the real world go back to school and become PHD's... I feel bad for all the people that State Farm made promises too so many years ago. It seems that you are no longer valued. What really burns is when they make special videos about how great the hubs are and the people that work there. People that walked in the door 10 minutes ago, and have no clue of the rich company history. Oh wait, that history is gone now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pix+PXIjTXS

You know, in all my time there, that is something I noticed as well with the escorting of VPs when they came to visit. Its interesting to watch how worked up people get, I don’t understand it. These “leaders” are doing/have done a poor job managing the systems department and now look what is happening. But the people who have been around a bit as well as the 1st line and director levels get all puckered up like its the second coming of christ when a VP shows up. This entire dumpster fire is now at the top of the list of achievements for the SF leadership...embarrassing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bdk+PXIjTXS

The problem here is that there are not leaders in the company. Calling someone a leader, or giving yourself that title does not make you a leader. Having leadership qualities is what makes some one a leader. Standing up for your people and not asking them to do something that you would not do yourself makes you a leader.

It is also odd how VP level people are treated like they are some kind of a deity. They are not, they are just people. It is not an event when they show up or anything like that. I recall seeing an analyst taken off of their work to escort one of these folks around. They make a lot, they can't find their way around a building without help?

There is no leadership. These folks only repeat what the 'leader' above them says. I think most may be fighting for their own survival.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jpb+PXIjTXS

SF Systems Is the biggest snake pit that I have ever encountered! That is more so the focus than doing the right things for their company and employees.

I worked there for 7 very miserable years witnessing this! Never once in 7 years in any Executive level discussions did I hear reference on what the impact to the policyholder or customer would be. No consideration at all!

They are focused on ALL of the wrong things.... to survive they need to advance their technology, provide convenience to their customer and lower their operational costs. Basic principles they still have yet to grasp. Not to mention the complete joke of having a Bank! The Banks customers are limited to SF employees only. What a waste of money spending oodles of $ to satisfy regulatory and compliance. Dump the bank, dump your inept technology leaders and start rebuilding your business!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gxl+PXIjTXS

I like the name you chose, I am also glad to be gone. The amount of repetitive corporate speak dragged me down. It seems like the corporate speak is the one thing that leadership has become expert at. It almost seemed impressive when I first started but you quickly see the BS. The leadership talks the funny sounding talk but couldn’t lead to save their own lives. “Driving the business”...right into a ditch. So much emphasis placed on the employees and metrics and branding yourself, but leadership as a whole is just awful. They lack knowledge, decision-making abilities, capbility to foster a growing team...they are just clueless. It’s astounding how that kind of poor performance has become systemic. Hopefully good people make it through or immediately find something new and rewarding.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oic+PXIjTXS

Post a reply

: