Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel got arrogant

When Intel was in its prime, consumers loved us. They got more value for less cost year after year. Shareholders were happy because the company's value kept growing and the stock splits were common. Intel was innovate and not afraid to make a new market when the current ones were getting flat or became commodities.

Then the PC came along, Intel got fat, rich, arrogant and lazy. Leadership and employees realized that options made them rich and started thinking about making their pile bigger. Throw in that the tax changes killed options and made us all employees with no great return regardless of the company's success. Management now are all carpetbaggers trying to get as much before the ship goes down or they get replaced.

People want Intel to fail because it's been arrogant for so long and failed to deliver when Google, TSMC or Apple have taken the lead. No one cares anymore, just like no one cares when P&G announce a new product or McDonalds says it will sell McRibs again. Sad but the Intel ship is going down and the BoD doesn't have the backbone to do what's needed because if you admit that TMG needs to get spun off, then Intel has to compete on design. Brand doesn't matter anymore, so outstanding product design is all we would have, but Apple and Google are building their own in house design capability. No one wants the kind of commonality that x86 created or the cost associated. Intel desperately wants to have the high margin, monopoly world exist again, but it's gone.

Really well put, @OmujTUD-1voz.

by
| 1637 views | | 6 replies (last July 22, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OnWRZrw

6 replies (most recent on top)

@1tfx @apf

Same person. This is HR. Ignore HR posts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xyc+OnWRZrw

When Intel was truly one or two technology process nodes ahead of everyone, in a growing market in which they had monopolistic dominance they were the proverbial 800lb gorilla. Now that intensity has morphed into toxicity.

I got to see first hand how Intel's toxic management culture took them out of the mobile market. (I'm resisting urges to name names.)

I saw in the news the U.S. Navy just launched the USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier with a unit price tag of $13B. Intel spent WAY more than that on mobile - puts it into perspective just how much PO and BK (et.al.) have screwed up a once amazing company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lzp+OnWRZrw

@OnWRZrw-1uxi - that's it exactly. I also came from an important customer to Intel. How many times did arrogant, ignorant, condescending a-holes who hadn't left JF other than to attend a meeting at some other Intel site or gorge themselves at some conference tell me that they knew much better than I did what my former employer and its customers needed.

I went along with it for a few months...until I realized that the emperor truly has no clothes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fxo+OnWRZrw

During NEO training over 5 years ago, asked trainer if Intel had any chips for mobile devices. Trainer laughed at the question along with some other people in the room, told me, "We make the best CPUs, no interest, and no money in mobile chips". That stuck with me since I came from a company that made chips for mobile devices. Look where we are now, Intel can't compete in the mobile market. Hopefully, customers will continue to buy what Intel gives them in the server market...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uxi+OnWRZrw

The arrogance in planning meetings is astounding.

There is not one customer oriented theme in any of these.

People who can think innovatively are rewarded with great ACTs.

Everyone parrots their manager and the vicious downward cycle is never ending till the purge at the top occurs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zff+OnWRZrw

true, we've long stopped being the leaders in the field

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ork+OnWRZrw

Post a reply

: