Why would ATS reduce the amount of time to perform a 3-box install from 2 hours to 1.5 hours? At 2 hrs per job, the number of jobs per day (if all jobs were 3 setters) would amount to 4.
If it changes to 1.5, a technician will be done (hopefully) in 6 hours.
That leaves ATS with two options:
ATS can decide NOT to cut down the workforce and lower the work hours per week, from 40, to 30 hours per week. No one is let go. It will also lower the amount ATS will have to pay for health care and salaries. You can thank ObamaCare for that.
Or, add more work and keep you at 40 hours per week. And if that is the case, then some guys will have to go. Why keep 100 guys on the payroll when 75 will do the same amount of work.
How many will be let go?
If you have 100 technicians at 8 hours per day, that amounts to 800 hours per day. The new "work load" amounts to 600 hours, which leaves ATS with 200 hours of "free time". Divide 200 hours by 8 hours per day.... gives you 25. That's twenty-five technicians.
Simple math. Now whom would ATS choose to be unemployed? If you were ATS, who would you choose? Would salaries have an effect on their decision? Here’s a hint….
“I don’t like to pay salaries. I pay as little as I can.”
And don’t forget those who chose NOT to take the 10% cut in pay. PAYBACK is a beetch. Do you honestly believe your new owner will allow a change in policy to make YOU happy?
DO YOU STILL THINK A UNION MAY NOT BE NECESSARY?
Or, will you fight this fight on your own? Will you “take it cool” and just move on?
I have no idea and I wish you a lot of luck and success in your future. Nor, am I Nostradamus in the prediction business. I’m just laying out the possibilities. As one “management troll” once said on this website, “It’s NOT about you (yours truly) and me (management), it’s business.”
Now YOU figure it out.
But use your head…. BE PREPARED.