Thread regarding BP PLC layoffs

Three percent?

Wow, just wow …

by
| 3572 views | | 9 replies (last March 16, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fk0Ip2x

9 replies (most recent on top)

  1. 5% here.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sgro+1fk0Ip2x

Looney gave himself a $3.3 million bonus. Imagine how much more he would have received if the stock wasn’t trading at 1996 prices. Shareholders received a 0% increase in the dividend after blowout earnings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6ipx+1fk0Ip2x

Got 4.1

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5dra+1fk0Ip2x

Its called smart accounting. smaller raise that limits future liability then more flexibility down the rode when you cull the herd less payout. every other industry been doing this for years get used to it spoiled people

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3oao+1fk0Ip2x

Rationalize an effective 4 percent paycut and see how that works out in the long run

And Inflation doesn’t have nearly the impact on upper echelon of salaries— but keep thinking that Bernie is sacrificing himself for the “little people”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dyh+1fk0Ip2x

I am sure Bernie and the EVPs received a 3% raise too. Stop complaining.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @suo+1fk0Ip2x

@xfx+1fk0Ip2x

Considering inflation is over 7% and the company had 8-year high profits last year, what do you think?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kod+1fk0Ip2x

Wow good or wow bad?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xfx+1fk0Ip2x

If you think about it, it’s smart to reward a higher bonus which is what they did. I think they gave 2-3% higher than they had to.. Then when the next round of cuts happens it helps control severance costs somewhat keeping salaries lower.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hmp+1fk0Ip2x

Post a reply

: