Thread regarding Hess Corp. layoffs

Don’t talk to Hess

Us Chevrons got an email that said, “don’t talk to Hess people.” If you have questions I’ll
Do my best to answer here! Welcome to the sh-t show.

by
| 2142 views | | 7 replies (last July 26) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k0jz9r5v

7 replies (most recent on top)

@16v that is correct. It was carefully presented as an EOI for an involuntary layoff, so the WARN numbers do include EOIs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @172+1k0jz9r5v

@15a That is not true. Expression of interest is to volunteer for an “involuntary layoff”. It’s clearly spelled out that way in every EOI. Well at least the 4-5 I have seen with CVX in the past 15 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16v+1k0jz9r5v

@x9 that doesn’t include those that EOI’d. EOI’s are considered voluntary departures and are not required to be disclosed in the WARN act totals for reporting purposes. So if 10% of workers EOI’d for example - which isn’t unreasonable considering those close to retirement - that would translate to 575 Houston + 85 EOI, and 70 Bakken + 75 EOI.

So 805 / roughly 1600. So 50% of the workforce.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15a+1k0jz9r5v

@vm

Not OP but I will help answer question. Total BS how they asked us not to talk to Hess when Chevron claims to be transparent lol.

I will only talk about PSG 25 and below since that’s coming in August :

11th- 13th - Functional Review
18th - 22nd - In Scope Notifications
22nd - Sep 2nd - Open positions
Sep. 15th - 19th - selection meetings
Sep. 22 - 25th - Outcome Notifications.

Meanwhile, org charts have not been released. They keep pushing back the date or org charts. If I were you, just AEOI/EOI when you have the chance. Save yourself the trouble

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @za+1k0jz9r5v

@pv 575 in Houston. 70 in the Bakken

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x9+1k0jz9r5v

@OP when will all of the wave 2 selections be completed?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vm+1k0jz9r5v

What’s the guess on Hess employee layoffs? We (Hess) are supposed to know on Monday

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pv+1k0jz9r5v

Post a reply

: