Thread regarding 3M layoffs

3M's Rank - WSJ - The 2026 Best Companies for the Future

The Wall Street Journal evaluates how leading US corps stack up in 6 areas: AI readiness, innovation, talent readiness, financial fitness, resilience and agility.

3M ranks #298 overall with an Overall Score of 47.8, below the Capital Goods industry average of 49.2. The company’s best factor is AI Rank #161, followed by Innovation at #214 and Resilience at #264. None of those are leadership scores, but they are not catastrophic either.

The issue is broad mediocrity plus weak financial and agility signals. 3M ranks #394 in Financial Fitness and #359 in Agility, which pulls the company below the middle of the table. Strategically, the data reads 3M as a legacy industrial innovation franchise whose future-readiness profile has eroded. The ranking is not giving it much credit for the historical brand of R&D excellence.

Source:
https://www.wsj.com/rankings/best-companies-for-the-future/full-rankings-2026

by
| 7 views | | 10 replies (last 10 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kva5e65n

10 replies (most recent on top)

@vm You guys are getting butt plugs? Luuuccckkkkyyyyyyy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @140+1kva5e65n

“even this leadership isn't so dense”

😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zq+1kva5e65n

@t3 I'm sure they pay for other lists...but even this leadership isn't so dense as to pay to be ranked #298. Are they???

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yn+1kva5e65n

Can we stop pretending that this place isn't an apocalyptic hellhole?

They're laying off marketers, outsourcing tech and analyst jobs to India, they don't promote internally, raises are eliminated, and they're rolling back remote work.

There's nothing positive to say about this company unless you love the company-branded butt plug.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vm+1kva5e65n

@t3 really?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tr+1kva5e65n

3M pays fortune to be on the list.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @t3+1kva5e65n

Agree that the company is too top heavy. An svp is an easy saving anywhere from half to one million per person per year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mv+1kva5e65n

Well, is anyone surprised by the results of having embraced mediocrity 25 years ago under McNerny?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1kva5e65n

@ct Sorry, best I can do is lay off the trained and talented people in the GSCs and replace them with AI and offshore contractors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cv+1kva5e65n

@OP then it’s time to reduce R&D spending by sending The CTO. SVPs R&D and CSA ( science advocate) all the top heavy people with no work, HOME !!! That will be a huge savings for BB

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1kva5e65n

Post a reply

: