That right...they are calling the total sell off of Intel Corporation. Bloomberg today Oregon Time 11:30am.
They did cite that it was due to decisions BEFORE PAT.
16 replies (most recent on top)
Try to dig out the sink hole first before talking sh-t about leadership
Right. Bloomberg is right about everything.
Kodak!! ROFL!!
@qou 50B with negative earnings and negative cash flow.
First rule when you are in a hole.
Stop digging.
Stop trying to catch TSMC. You don’t have the revenues to support the capex required to be competitive.
Figure out a plan to become fabless. That has a much higher probability of success.
In the semiconductor world having the N/N+1 node is like being a highlander from the ‘80’s movie and still having your head. The number of firms always seems to go down. We lost our head and Pat’s trying to reattach it. He says the effort is going well…
Yeah ; it s a $50B+ business , clearly pointless let’s shut up shop vs deal with its issues.
Intel has over 75% of the desktop and server cpu market. OP is a troll.
Let's not forget National Semiconductor.
Goodbye Nokia. Oh I mean Intel.
OP, go trolling somewhere else.
Goodbye General Electric. Oh I mean Intel.
Goodbye IBM Semiconductor Manufacturing. Remember they paid Global $3 billion to take over their assets. Oh I mean Intel.
Goodbye Motorola. Oh I mean Intel.
No mobile products because of Otellini and no GPU products because of Swan. Gelsinger only made the situation worse by promoting and initiating massive expansion plans without competitve products and customers. Starting turning the lights off to say more money.
Ok, let's assume a split in the way Bloomberg says. Which I do think will happen.
What do you do with groups that are directly in the mfg line, but that can be done at either side - mostly test of some sort. Shift them off with foundry or keep in house?
Goodbye Kodak. I mean Intel.