Thread regarding Apache Corp. layoffs

Layoffs are coming

Execs appear to be looking at organization as a whole and realizing what the market has for years - Apache is not a sustainable company. Apache’s assets are not great, inventory is poor, debt is too high, and the entire future of the company is relying on either a huge commodity price run or Suriname being as good as Exxon’s Guyana assets (which all publicly available data to date indicates is that it is not). Layoffs are coming as they continue to sell assets.

Permian management, since the CEO was in charge, we’re laughably bad (worst in the industry?) making decisions that destroyed almost all of Apache’s tier 1 inventory. What is left is a few years of inventory on a 2-3 rig program that barely scrapes by on economics. No growth and terrible inventory...not something that makes the company look great.

The remainder of Texas legacy assets are all being considered for sale or are already on the block. This will further gut cash flow and the funds received will be used for nothing of value based on the CEOs track record. Billions of assets have been sold since he took the reigns and debt remains relatively the same while the proceeds from the sales have disappeared into oblivion and market cap/enterprise value has dropped significantly.

North Sea is a a dying asset and a liability. It churns some cash today but the liabilities are a huge issue.

GOM is a massive liability and Apache is about to get hundreds of millions (or more) in liabilities back once the CEOs buddies bankrupt the company we sold garbage assets to.

Egypt is not great due to the terrible contracts with the Egyptian government. If the publicly disclosed renegotiated contracts come to fruition this could be beneficial, however, no update has been given on this since it was announced months ago which means things likely went sideways or the government is not agreeing to what Apache needs. Inventory here is thin as well so this asset doesn’t look good after another 5+ years.

Alpine High? No need to harp on this.

Exploration has been a complete joke with dollars burned as fast as they were given to Keenan.

Suriname from the outside looks exciting and may turn out to be great, but there is a lot of hair surrounding it and the economics are questionable.

Overall, Apache has a major cash flow problem which will get really ugly in 3-5 years. The execs have to be looking at a merger at this point for a major shakeup and longevity or the company will get worse and worse until it’s swallowed up for pennies on the dollar.

by
| 3972 views | | 13 replies (last August 30, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ci4Z2Cu

13 replies (most recent on top)

Hopefully we make it to January!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @isio+1ci4Z2Cu

Didn't you guys just pay off like 1.7 BN$ of notes? Where did all that money come from?

Certainly didn't come from JC or the Beluga's bonus fund.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8ved+1ci4Z2Cu

Another retirement offer round coming??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5kou+1ci4Z2Cu

@pwu+1ci4Z2Cu well, the answer is to significantly downsize the top levels, but since they’re also the ones making those decisions it’s not exactly in their personal best interests.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ndc+1ci4Z2Cu

I second that vvvvvv

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ufm+1ci4Z2Cu

Way Way too top heavy. However, how much deeper can they cut at current conditions? Maybe with more divestitures. Sheesh.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pwu+1ci4Z2Cu

start with cutting the fat in Post Oak Central. how many damn 'managers' and 'directors' do you need? 'computer' people who don't even support the program we use because they're project or 'directors' are making $150 to $200 grand a year plus bonus on "digital transformation" while they cut and sell the barn. why are there so many people when moving to Dallas was suppose to save so much money?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jma+1ci4Z2Cu

The posters overall statements are correct, and there is stuff going on from a staffing perspective. The newly created “Business Process Optimization” team is hiring a project manager right now. This new BPO team has the same goal as what our id--t execs paid the external consultants millions of dollars to do with the re-org...lower costs, reduce G&A, etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ecv+1ci4Z2Cu

Nicely put. But Let’s not spark fear or drama unless you can (with evidence) prove that layoffs are coming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @whq+1ci4Z2Cu

Hear, all ye good people, hear what this brilliant and eloquent speaker has to say!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ypp+1ci4Z2Cu

so who exactly is getting laid off and when. departments? size etc?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wzy+1ci4Z2Cu

Nice to read such well written and accurate comments. And his greatest failure Alpine High wasn’t even highlighted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @agr+1ci4Z2Cu

The key part of your post is that the current CEO used to manage the Permian.

His track record there was terrible—drilling hundreds of marginal wells and essentially squandering (if not outright ruining) the company’s assets.

And then after he left and got promoted he demoted the then-existing VP and continued to meddle in the Permian’s inventory and basically hamstrung FT from growing the base and inventory.

And then he put in ME, who was just an unmitigated disaster just like his former employer was and is.

And then he handed out a construction deal to a relative to build a new office building, spending millions in the process, only to then turn around and basically abandon it within a year and a half.

In short, there is nothing from the CEO’s past that would suggest that he has the foggiest idea how to run a company successfully, and there is certainly nothing of present that would provide any reasons to change that assessment.

Why the Board keeps him on is one of life’s greater mysteries.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dve+1ci4Z2Cu

Post a reply

: