Thread regarding Edward Jones layoffs

Interesting post over on LinkedIn

Saw a post on LinkedIn and found it interesting; Coffee Badging: When nearly half of a workforce develops a workaround to formally comply with a rule while simultaneously circumventing it, the workforce isn't the problem. The rule is the problem. Coffee badging is the silent proof that mandatory office attendance produces presence – but not value creation.

At the same time, 49% of managers themselves admit that their teams work more productively in hybrid or remote setups. Another 31% say location makes no difference. (Source: Owl Labs, 2024) That means: 80% of decision-makers know that mandatory office attendance doesn't deliver results. And enforce it anyway. Why? Because leading through results is harder than leading through visibility. Anyone who doesn't define clear goals, doesn't have processes that make performance measurable, and lacks trust in their own organization – needs attendance as a substitute metric. Mandatory office presence is not a productivity tool. It's a leadership deficit disguised as policy.

A study by the University of Pittsburgh analyzed the reintroduction of mandatory office attendance across 137 S&P 500 companies. Result: No measurable performance improvement. But declining employee satisfaction. Stanford professor Nicholas Bloom shows in his long-term study that hybrid models reduce resignation rates by a third – without any loss in productivity. The companies tightening the rules now – Amazon with 5 days, SAP with 3 mandatory days, Deutsche Bank banning home office on Fridays – aren't solving a performance problem. They're solving a trust problem. With the wrong tool.

Spotify does it differently. "Work is something you do, not a place you go." Lower turnover than its competitors with mandatory office attendance. Coffee badging doesn't disappear through stricter rules. It disappears through better leadership: clear goals, measurable results, genuine trust. Everything else is waste – of time, commutes, and motivation.

Sources: Owl Labs – State of Hybrid Work Report 2024 University of Pittsburgh – Ding/Ma, RTO Study S&P 500 Stanford – Nicholas Bloom, Hybrid Work Study


by
| 2095 views | | 13 replies (last February 28) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kh7zcsdt

13 replies (most recent on top)

@2mf I also think that if this keeps getting worse and rumors of the 1000 overseas service jobs is true, it needs to be brought to local media in st louis somehow. Bad PR in St Louis spreads like gas on a fire because we are so much like a small town. The reputation of us is already tainted after last year, so for ELT to continue and double down just shows that they are actively going to war against their employees for nothing other than greed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mn+1kh7zcsdt

@2mf I love this idea. I’d sign. Save copies of it and plan to send it into local news stations too.

Public awareness of all of the atrocities we’re facing is some of the best way to apply pressure to PP and the ELT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mh+1kh7zcsdt

@d1 I’m working on a letter that addresses all the frustrations many are feeling, and plan to have people sign it like a petition, and then send it to Penny.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mf+1kh7zcsdt

I am 100% sure they don’t have the tech or infrastructure to manage everyone on lockdown. They will can scare us all and destroy our culture…100% agree with that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @20w+1kh7zcsdt

@pc https://fortune.com/2026/02/17/ai-productivity-paradox-ceo-study-robert-solow-information-technology-age/

Another they will ignore because the short term benefit to their wealth is the most important

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @194+1kh7zcsdt

So on June 1 - everyone just stay home - refuse to go in, even those already hybrid. What are they going to do if all HO employees say NOPE?!?!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17f+1kh7zcsdt

I hear “Union”
Finally!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11f+1kh7zcsdt

They all know this. They don't care.

We are too far gone at this point with terrible, weak, shallow and toxic leaders having poisoned Home Office to make decisions that are based in data, logic, and reasoning.

We stopped hiring leaders based on character and instead on perceived pedigree.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sm+1kh7zcsdt

https://www.softwareseni.com/what-research-really-shows-about-return-to-office-mandates-and-productivity/ ....This another good article about RTO. Of course the low iq walnuts in ELT will never grasp any of this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pc+1kh7zcsdt

I'm going to print out 100s of copies of this and leave them laying all over north and south campus lol. We are now a company that doesn't care about "those" numbers or studies. The only thing that matters is the labor cost number going down while chubak rubs his hands wuth glee in his NYC hub

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1kh7zcsdt

@cn Extremely well said. To your analogy, I’m one of the frogs that jumped out of the boiling pot last year. The blatant lies and gaslighting, paired with promotion freezes and other detrimental decisions, were too much to withstand staying.

With enough patience and tenacity, anyone unhappy at Jones can find a good fit elsewhere. I did, and you can too. You owe it to yourself to not be stuck somewhere that clearly doesn’t care about their associates anymore.

Ted Jones would be absolutely ashamed of what has become of the place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1kh7zcsdt

The thing is... We can be reasonably certain Jones already knows this; and it was never about "trying to improve performance". I think it's a very hard argument to make that it is. If anything this feels like a strategic strike against morale, made with intention, for results that go beyond the surface in a way they don't want to tell us.

Everything to do with ER has had a lot of "read between the lines" and a great example is all the way back when "sourcing and shoring" was first spotted in a presentation. They danced around the word "layoff" but we all knew what this meant. That's more blatant corporate speak, the RTO/coffee badging is a different kind of corporate speak - a bold-faced lie. No part of this mandate is actually made with the intention of improving performance, it's made with the intention of identifying the loyal and desperate while also reducing headcount for their bottom line.

Corporations aren't our friends as much as the culture has told us over the years that this one actually is. The reason we all question the intent is because of that culture because these decisions directly challenge what we've come to believe and expect. The best analogy I can make would be frogs in a pot of water; That pot has been nice and habitable for a hundred years. Suddenly the temperature started rising, the water started boiling, but every frog denies it's happening because it's been a hundred years! This couldn't possibly be happening to us, could it? All the while the chef in the kitchen tells us "You looked cold, this is for the best, don't worry we're keeping you in mind. This is for your benefit." The frogs just let it happen, watching the other frogs boil, saying "It couldn't happen to me".

I'm no different and I'm not special. I'm one of those frogs. I wanted to believe that's not what was happening because life was simpler, it was a stress I could plausibly deny, but I can't deny it anymore. To drop the anology; what made Jones unique and special is gone, the safety and security is gone. I'm looking to leave at my earliest opportunity and unfortunately that part of my mind that had trust is gone. I trust no corporation, I trust no CEO/MP/ELT, and I will be keeping this experience in mind when the signs start showing again. Loyalty to a single company is dead; job hop every 2-3 years to look out for yourself and your family first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cn+1kh7zcsdt

Spot on!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1kh7zcsdt

Post a reply

: