Thread regarding Baker Hughes layoffs

Baker Hughes, the Anti-Energy Energy Company

Ah, here in the sprawling ecosystem of modern corporate folly, we find Baker Hughes, a once-proud multinational oil-and-gas conglomerate, now in the delicate throes of transformation—or as some might say, a slow-motion implosion. Much like watching a hippo attempt ballet, it is both mesmerizing and tragic.

Observe now the Chief Financial Officer, a sharp-suited predator with spreadsheets for claws. His method of survival is simple: slash and burn. With the precision of a hedge trimmer operated by a caffeine-addled squirrel, he trims the shop floor to the bone, eliminating scores of frontline workers who once kept Baker’s industrial heart pumping. Curiously untouched, however, is the lush canopy of middle management, which continues to thrive—sheltered, bloated, and mostly harmless aside from the agility of cold molasses. Meetings now occur in dense clusters, generating no output but considerable humidity.

Meanwhile, high atop the executive canopy, we spot the tiny CEO, an elusive creature rarely seen in the wild without a DEI pamphlet or a freshly tweeted virtue signal. His primary instinct appears to be appeasement—of activists, ESG indexes, and large institutional shareholders such as BlackRock—regardless of their alignment with Baker’s very reason for existence. He has proudly repositioned the company as “aggressively post-carbon,” a bold stance for an entity whose core product is, inconveniently, carbon. The irony is lost on him, but not on the engineers, who now update oil rig designs to feature solar-powered coffee makers in order to stay “on message.”

But let us not forget the Director of Supply Chain, who moves with the grace of a rhinoceros in a crystal shop, bellowing for cost savings. His approach is... delicate. Vendors, once partners in a symbiotic relationship, are now squeezed like overripe fruit for price concessions, while being told they will be paid—eventually. Perhaps in 180 days. Or when the moon aligns with Mars. As expected, many vendors begin to rebel, rejecting purchase orders outright. The result: a flurry of onboarding sessions with fresh, untested suppliers who, while eager, spend their first few months attempting unsuccessfully which end of the part is which.

Back on the shop floor, those few remaining workers struggle beneath the weight of unchanged workloads. Some experience what psychologists might call "survivor guilt", though they more commonly refer to it as "a total fu--ing nightmare." Productivity slows, errors increase, and absenteeism begins to rise—not from illness, but from sheer existential fatigue. The factory becomes a haunted place, where the ghost of competence past lingers in every under-maintained tool.

Without a cohesive identity, Baker now flounders—neither fish nor fowl, neither oil company nor ESG darling. It tries to appeal to everyone and pleases no one, a corporate platypus in an industry that demands sharks. And so, like many before it, Baker inches toward the inevitable: not a dramatic explosion, but a slow, wheezing collapse, buried under PowerPoint decks, unpaid invoices, and the haunting echo of missed earnings calls.

Ah, nature always finds balance—even if it must wait for the board to be replaced.

by
| 3542 views | | 9 replies (last June 29) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jsmpsr0d

9 replies (most recent on top)

Baker Hughes is dead already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9kf+1jsmpsr0d

Yup poor education look at stoneywood drilling dept f-ups

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @149+1jsmpsr0d

@jv+1jsmpsr0d
Seriously Buddy, if you want to come on here & keep calling people thick and accuse them of being poorly educated , you really need to learn how to string a sentence together in English first.
There's none so thick as those who keep calling everybody else thick without adding anything of value themselves.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k4+1jsmpsr0d

Hey why scotch so thick poor education?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jv+1jsmpsr0d

That was a great post! Thanks for putting that together, made my afternoon!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1jsmpsr0d

But we'll always have The Mobius. No! No! Not like that!! That's the wrong font! Oh my god that's not an approved color! What are you doing to the precious?? Adhere to The Guidelines of The Mobius or forever be cast into the lake of invert!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1jsmpsr0d

Given the number of "acquisitions" they've made trying to prop up and obfuscate the numbers, conglomerate can be applied. Just not successful conglomerate. Maybe if they lay off more field hands and engineers, the productivity will improve. In fact, just 3rd-party everything and role in pure profits!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1jsmpsr0d

Any Engineering company that places management bonuses based on cost cutting above increases in sales & productivity is doomed to failure any way you put it.
Equally, any manufacturing / service company that gives up on its Skilled Engineers & Dedicated workforce, & places its attention on Narcissistic Non-productive PowerPoint Lovies & Paper Pushers, complete with their insecurities & self-loathing's, is on an express downward spiral.
Baker used to be based on pride & genuine values, but no more, & we are well past the critical point of no return.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1jsmpsr0d

Oil and gas conglomerate is flattering. It was nothing more than a bog standard service company with very poor management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1jsmpsr0d

Post a reply

: